<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Easily manipulated man]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jon Voight</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>PrometheusTree64</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 11, 2016 08:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In the '70s and '80s, Voight was your prototypical Hollywood liberal. In the 21st century, he's your prototypical conservative.<br />
But he falls back on shallow talking points regardless of which side he's promoting or pummeling.<br />
In the '80s, when he was involved in Native American rights, he gave a tearful speech saying that a mystical wondrous event was about to unfold. As a result, embarrassed tribe elders had to go in fron of the cameras to say they had no idea what Voight was talking about.<br />
At least Mary Tyler Moore had the excuse of her brain and body shutting down to explain her eleventh-hour surge to the right politically.<br />
Voight, on the other hand, just seems to be foolishly sputtering along as he always has, regardless of which ticket he's supporting this week.<br />
LBJ's mistress on JFK:</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/84588/easily-manipulated-man</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:31:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/84588.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 01:33:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>