<![CDATA[Henry Gibson would be my second choice, but Gene would have been absolutely perfect.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Gene Wilder

5535 — 9 years ago(September 03, 2016 10:31 AM)

Henry Gibson would be my second choice, but Gene would have been absolutely perfect.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/84772/henry-gibson-would-be-my-second-choice-but-gene-would-have-been-absolutely-perfectRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 19:10:26 GMTWed, 15 Apr 2026 01:49:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Henry Gibson would be my second choice, but Gene would have been absolutely perfect. on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 01:49:39 GMT]]>suicidea — 9 years ago(September 20, 2016 07:30 PM)

We already know he does look good in a hat, anyway.
Never be complete.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/844786https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/844786Wed, 15 Apr 2026 01:49:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Henry Gibson would be my second choice, but Gene would have been absolutely perfect. on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 01:49:38 GMT]]>Duragizer — 9 years ago(September 06, 2016 03:21 PM)

I never considered the possibility before, but now that you mention it, I agree; he would've been a great choice.
A Superman without trunks isn't worth watching or reading about.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/844785https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/844785Wed, 15 Apr 2026 01:49:38 GMT