<![CDATA[You'd Have To Believe Fox News…]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Roscoe Arbuckle

carlgt1 — 16 years ago(February 14, 2010 09:12 AM)

is "fair and balanced" to call Roscoe Arbuckle guilty because Hearst's media empire (the Rupert Murdoch/Fox News of the day) trumped it all up to make money.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/85255/you-d-have-to-believe-fox-newsRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 06:00:22 GMTWed, 15 Apr 2026 02:29:42 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to You'd Have To Believe Fox News… on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:29:44 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/848244https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/848244Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:29:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to You'd Have To Believe Fox News… on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:29:43 GMT]]>ZildjianDFW — 14 years ago(May 07, 2011 04:41 PM)

I hope you didn't pull anything, stretching, as you did, to include a jab at Fox News in a context where it really isn't warranted. The smear campaign against Arbuckle was driven by the media's desire for dirt. It wasn't ideological. Fox News may be quite ideological, but they're no more sensationalistic than the rest of the media is (or more ideological, for that matter - they simply have a different ideology than most of the media, which drives some people crazy).

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/848243https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/848243Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:29:43 GMT