<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply du]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cate Blanchett</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>MladenVuk</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 15, 2017 11:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply due to the nature of the performance. And yet, is it out of reach, with news of Sundance premiere, that this may be considered as a movie role and be nominated for every award 5b4there is out there?<br />
If Academy and various awarding bodies decide that this may be the performance that can change our own perspective on what the movie performance actually is, Blanchett will be soaring on the amazing narrative. And with this narrative giving her range as no other role, it can be rather glorious moment in movie history. And if anyone has the credibility  and artistic integrity to take the movie world to the places where it has never been before, it is certainly Cate Blanchett.<br />
Yes, I knnow, it is crazy to even think about this. But, still, does/would Blanchett have chances at next year's award circuit?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/86685/by-all-means-this-may-be-the-wildest-of-the-wild-possibilities-not-because-mrs-blanchett-is-a-long-shot-but-simply-du</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 03:14:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/86685.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply du on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MladenVuk</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 30, 2017 12:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So, here are some reviews of "Manifesto"<br />
<a href="http://www.monstersandcritics.com/smallscreen/cate-blanchetts-manifesto-is-the-ultimate-art-house-film/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.monstersandcritics.com/smallscreen/cate-blanchetts-manifesto-is-the-ultimate-art-house-film/</a><br />
<a href="http://variety.com/2017/film/reviews/manifesto-review-cate-blanchett-julian-rosefeldt-1201970923/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://variety.com/2017/film/reviews/manifesto-review-cate-blanchett-julian-rosefeldt-1201970923/</a><br />
<a href="http://theplaylist.net/cate-blanchett-is-thrilling-brings-cinematic-verve-to-manifesto-sundance-review-20170124/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://theplaylist.net/cate-blanchett-is-thrilling-brings-cinematic-verve-to-manifesto-sundance-review-20170124/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/manifesto-review-967077" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/manifesto-review-967077</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857956</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857956</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply du on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ZodiacBlanchettFiennes</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 11:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh my God!<br />
I really hope so. Have only seen like 60 minutes of Manifesto and she is SLAYING!<br />
"I am simply not there"  Patrick Bateman</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857955</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857955</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply du on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Artanis_Finarfiniel</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 04:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But, still In her career, Blanchett managed to pull the impossible. She remains the last person to be nominated for 2 Oscars in the same year, someone who broke all the records with "Blue Jasmine" in a year with probably the fiercest competition in that category. She managed to bring "Carol" to life, a movie that has everything against it and so little for it. Bob Dylan, Katherine Hepburn These are the roles we all love this woman for. She shows us that there is something profoundly artistic and transcendent in what she does.People get nominated with so forgettable roles, but when Blanchett is nominated, it is just to see what the art on movie looks like. And if her team sees the opportunity, I say it, grab it We need more of this woman.<br />
I agree with all of this.<br />
Slightly related, I didn't realise until the other day that Cate actually holds the record for the largest awards sweep for a single performance of all time for Blue Jasmine. She won<br />
46 awards<br />
for that movie alone!<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/12334873/awards" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/12334873/awards</a><br />
Where on earth does she put them all?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857954</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857954</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply du on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MladenVuk</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 05:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Objectively, I do agree, but hey, a man can dram <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /><br />
I am not acquainted with the Academy's rules, save that it has to be screened in the previous years in USA. And yeah, realistically, this is a far-fethched<br />
But, still In her career, Blanchett managed to pull the impossible. She remains the last person to be nominated for 2 Oscars in the same year, someone who broke all the records with "Blue Jasmine" in a year with probably the fiercest competition in that category. She managed to bring "Carol" to life, a movie that has everything against it and so little for it. Bob Dylan, Katherine Hepburn These are the roles we all love this woman for. She shows us that there is something profoundly artistic and transcendent in what she does.People get nominated with so forgettable roles, but when Blanchett is nominated, it is just to see what the art on movie looks like. And if her team sees the opportunity, I say it, grab it We need more of this woman.<br />
Simply, if anyone can bring ART back to the Oscars, that is Cate Blanchett.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857953</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857953</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply du on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Artanis_Finarfiniel</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 16, 2017 10:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">To echo<br />
nicolas78<br />
, I'm not sure if Cate would be eligible for an Oscar nomination or any other such industry award for Manifesto because it wasn't originally created as a feature film but an art exhibition. I'm pretty sure that a feature has to be released theatrically in both New York and Los Angeles to be eligible for the Oscars, so it probably depends on what happens after Sundance and if it gets picked up for some kind of limited theatre release. Even if that did happen, I'm still not entirely sure she would be eligible due to the fact that the exhibition has been touring globally since early 2016.<br />
It would be well deserved though, everything I've seen so far has absolutely astonished me. How does she do it?? I remember the New York Times saying that if the art world gave out Oscars, Cate should definitely win.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857952</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857952</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to By all means, this may be the wildest of the wild possibilities, not because Mrs Blanchett is a long-shot, but simply du on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nicolas78</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 16, 2017 03:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think that it was first shown as an exhibit in a museum(?) with 12 giant screens all of them playing one character in a loop. And it was done in 2016. Even if it hits cinemas in 2017 in the US, I believe that the exhibit "cancels" the rule the Academy has, that the movie, so as to be eligible, has to<br />
premiere<br />
in US cinemas in 2017. But if they dont take the exhibit as a "screening", then it could be eligible.<br />
And even if it does, I think that it will only be nominated, a win is too streched.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857951</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/857951</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:19:04 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>