<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Just noticed this dude remade The Squaw Man twice (1914, -18, -38).  Does anybody know why this is, my initial guess is]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cecil B. DeMille</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>danickster</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 24, 2016 06:23 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just noticed this dude remade The Squaw Man twice (1914, -18, -38).  Does anybody know why this is, my initial guess is he wanted a bigger budget or was a a perfectionist.<br />
-?<br />
<a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uhyfVEVY_oQ" rel="nofollow ugc">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uhyfVEVY_oQ</a><br />
"I am I am I said I'm not myself. I'm not dead and</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/88658/just-noticed-this-dude-remade-the-squaw-man-twice-1914-18-38-does-anybody-know-why-this-is-my-initial-guess-is</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:24:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/88658.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:15:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>