<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[One of the True Greats]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cecil B. DeMille</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>classicmoviecomedy</strong> — <em>18 years ago(September 09, 2007 10:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I can't think of any other director whose career at the top spanned as many decades as DeMille. He directed what many consider to be his first masterpiece, THE CHEAT, in 1915, and continued through 1956 with his epic THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.<br />
I look at the work that came between, and see a remarkable body of incredibly diverse work, held together by common themes and stylistic traits. His epics of the 1910s (such as JOAN THE WOMAN) are perfect examples of what was possible in Hollywood when virtually unlimited resources were available (D.W. Griffith was able to make INTOLERANCE, a film that even today is estimated that it could not be made due to what it would cost in modern dollars). The 1920s saw his wonderful romantic comedies, often mixed with social satire worthy of Lubitsch, the best of which is probably THE AFFAIRS OF ANATOL. He continued these types of films well into the 1930s, with films like the wonderfully weird MADAM SATAN and FOUR FRIGHTENED PEOPLE (very similar in tone to his 1919 film MALE AND FEMALE). His taste for the historical epic, which continued throughout much of the rest of his career, can be split into the "ancient history/biblical epic" films such as THE TEN COMMANDMENTS (both versions), THE KING OF KINGS, SIGN OF THE CROSS, CLEOPATRA, etc. And starting with THE PLAINSMAN in 1937, he developed an excellent series of American historical epics, including UNION PACIFIC and UNCONQUERED. Perhaps DeMille's most personal film is THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH, which offers a self-reflective view of show business, and what better metaphor for DeMille's cinema than the carefully choreographed and expertly exploited showmanship of the American circus?<br />
I think it's ashame that DeMille is often derided as a mere "popular" filmmaker, which overlooks the incredible skill with which he executed his films on a scale larger than anything before or since.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">View my films at: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/comedyfilm" rel="nofollow ugc">www.youtube.com/comedyfilm</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/88689/one-of-the-true-greats</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 22:37:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/88689.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One of the True Greats on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>cwente2</strong> — <em>17 years ago(October 25, 2008 07:25 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">classicmoviecomedy,<br />
I agree and nicely said.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873499</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873499</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One of the True Greats on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bjnevin</strong> — <em>17 years ago(October 24, 2008 05:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I know he was not really regarded as much of a director of actors but in any case, I feel it necessary to admire the way in which he effectively executed such large-scale projects with many spectacular scenes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873498</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873498</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One of the True Greats on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Thrift_Store_Junkie05</strong> — <em>17 years ago(April 12, 2008 11:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Cecil B. DeMille undeniably directed some great films, much of which were from the silent era. However, he is vastly overrated and I would be hardpressed just to include him amongst the 50 greatest directors to ever live. He was certainly not as adept in filmmaking as King Vidor, nor as versatile and innovative. DeMille could really only succeed in big-budget spectacles, films  deliriously over-the-top drenched in lavish costumes, elaborate set designs and glossed over beyond imaginable and though these films were without question mammoth and visually stunning, the vast majority of his work was mediocre at best.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873497</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873497</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One of the True Greats on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873496</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/873496</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:18:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>