I watched her on All My Children in 1981. She was not born in 1968. And HS graduation is the key. I was born in early November and cut it close when I started kindergarten when was not yet 5. She would have started when she was nearly 6 - probably in August or September of 1964. So she would have finished kindergarten in 65, and 12 years later would have graduated from HS in '77 - like her bio says. Unless she graduated at 15, she'd have to have been born in 1958. Yes, she looks great. Botox and tweaks.

It's all lies.
If you look at the pictures you can clearly see that the year of birth is somewhat 1968 - probaly later.
If she's really 50 already she's by far the most attractive 50 year old I've ever seen.

This message has been deleted.

'58 or '61 doesn't matter.
I still think she's hot.

she can not be born in 1958. that would make her 50! She can't be 50! she is way to good looking for that age.

This message has been deleted.

I have an old Soap Opera Digest Magazine from 1986 Inside there is an interview along with a Fact File. The fact File says 1958. And the Kim Delaney interview Says, Kim Delaney was born November 1958.
i believe it to be true.

I remember IMDB used to say she was born in 1961. Then it said she was born in 1959 and now it's 1958. WTF!!
Sometimes in comedy you have to generalize ~ George Carlin

As good as she looks, the question becomes could she possibly be 49 and lookin' that good? Also, I remember her character on All My Children and I am fairly certain she was a late-teenager or maybe 20 when she started. That would put her closer to the 1961 date 23 seems too old.

I thought she was the same age as me. I was born in 1961 also. I just wish I looked as good as she does.