<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[At least in Kim Delaney&#x27;s case.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kim Delaney</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mate_73</strong> — <em>17 years ago(October 20, 2008 01:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">At least in Kim Delaney's case.<br />
There a problem, fool??<br />
THE IMDBLACK MAN</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/88782/at-least-in-kim-delaney-s-case</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 16:07:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/88782.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:26:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>