<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[He was the King Midas of Hollywood]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — James Garner</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Minerva_Meybridge</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 21, 2014 11:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Everything he acted in turned to gold. I've seen him in Maverick and Rockford Files. Maverick was filmed over half a century ago, and it could stand up today against the best of anything shot today. But he wasn't an actor. He was just himself reading lines. Brett Maverick and Jim Rockford were James Garner in other lives. It is such a shame that such great people have to grow old an die. Whoever made that rule was either cruel or insane.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/90294/he-was-the-king-midas-of-hollywood</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 12:47:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/90294.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:35:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He was the King Midas of Hollywood on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:35:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>anthny_platt</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 25, 2016 08:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He was an actor.  He didn't have range.  He couldn't play outside of himself well.  But he didn't just stand there and deliver lines.<br />
He'd probably call himself a 'reactor', because he worked very hard at believable reactions to the events of the story.  And it shows.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/885048</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/885048</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:35:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He was the King Midas of Hollywood on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:35:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Krystyane</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 11, 2014 04:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Love your thread title!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/885047</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/885047</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:35:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to He was the King Midas of Hollywood on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:35:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>denise1234</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 25, 2014 12:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Minerva_Meybridge^<br />
"It is such a shame that such great people have to grow old an die. Whoever made that rule was either cruel or insane."<br />
I totally agree ~<br />
~~ The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what fiction means ~ ~ Oscar Wilde</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/885046</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/885046</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:35:45 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>