<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Few Lawyers who know the case]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Hulk Hogan</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>j_mcmillan33</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 06, 2016 02:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Few different lawyers I've listened to say that Gawker will probably win the appeal at the very least the amount will be severely dropped</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/91086/few-lawyers-who-know-the-case</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 22:31:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/91086.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:47:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Few Lawyers who know the case on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:47:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Catdubh</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 10, 2016 11:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So, that's why Gawker just filed bankruptcy rather than listening to these legal giants you have listened to (where are they?)? If that were a real probability, the court would have granted Gawker a stay.<br />
Jack's not dead! Jack would never die without telling me, first!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/891066</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/891066</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:47:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>