<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[http:&#x2F;&#x2F;shareddarkness.com&#x2F;2010&#x2F;01&#x2F;23&#x2F;beyond-a-reasonable-doubt-dvd.asp x]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Peter Hyams</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>noahtenzin</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 02, 2010 05:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://shareddarkness.com/2010/01/23/beyond-a-reasonable-doubt-dvd.asp" rel="nofollow ugc">http://shareddarkness.com/2010/01/23/beyond-a-reasonable-doubt-dvd.asp</a> x<br />
^ Says that the problem is that the movie "is defined by stock characters, and totally caught up in pedestrian notions of thrills rather than the sort of intellectual chess moves that would make this sort of story robust and satisfying."<br />
Thoughts?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/91486/http-shareddarkness-com-2010-01-23-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt-dvd-asp-x</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:15:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/91486.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:38:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>