<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Were they deliberately trying to hide her legs&#x2F;but in Buffy?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kristy Swanson</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jgroub</strong> — <em>17 years ago(August 21, 2008 06:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love Kristy Swanson like nobody's business, but it seemed to me that all throughout the whole movie, they were deliberately trying to cover up her, ahem, assets. She's always wearing some spandex or leotard over her legs, and they never get a really good shot of her butt, or when they do, the fabric of the leotard is a pattern so you can't get a real good look at what's going on.<br />
Anybody else think that there was some kind of plot "to keep the goods from being revealed" all throughout the movie? I sure did! I wanted to see that butt!<br />
I asked the doctor to take your picture so I can look at you from inside as well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/95870/were-they-deliberately-trying-to-hide-her-legs-but-in-buffy</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 12:53:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/95870.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:13:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Were they deliberately trying to hide her legs&#x2F;but in Buffy? on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:13:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ecavuto</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 15, 2012 03:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Being a colossal leg fiend with a healthy appreciation of rear ends I noticed that Kristy's limbs got precious little exposure in this movie. I think it was for the best because while Kristy has a phenomenal overall appe16d0arance her legs just aren't that great.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/928140</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/928140</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:13:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Were they deliberately trying to hide her legs&#x2F;but in Buffy? on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:13:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>decrepitmonkey</strong> — <em>17 years ago(November 10, 2008 09:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Also there were a couple scenes where she was wearing [jean] shorts, without leggings, etc.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/928139</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/928139</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:13:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Were they deliberately trying to hide her legs&#x2F;but in Buffy? on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:13:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rickysk8</strong> — <em>17 years ago(August 25, 2008 10:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">that is really funny that you noticed that too and i had read an article many moons ago, maybe fangoria magazine that buffy was shot in the winter time all outside and all at night, and that the reason she had the leggings with a cheerleading costume was for warmth and also stunts etc. makes sense</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/928138</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/928138</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:13:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>