You do realise it was a joke right? I was poking fun at the people who do actually think the American title is offensive, since forums where those sorts of opinions appear also seem to spend ages nitpicking at every plot change in every film and griping about it.

@ Overwatch17 It's an INSULT to call it Sorcerer's Stone? What a stupid statement. Yes it's lame that they released it under that name, but since they did, it counts as a correct title.
Philosopher's Stone is a better title of course, but think about it : For the past 10 years or so, we have been reading that book and watching that film and seeing and hearing them say "Sorcerer's Stone" over and over again. You can't expect us to call it Philosopher's, can you? Please don't blame US readers/viewers for Scholastic's decision.
Back on topic, I agree that he'll probably be in the film. That scene is crucial, I don't know how they could cut it.

His appearance near the end is pretty important, it'll probably be in there. Oh and Angelkrista, calling the first book Sorcerors Stone is more insulting than any of the films (except maybe Half Blood Prince, that one sucked).

I'd laugh in your face in response, you stupid fanboy/girl. Gambon made Dumbledore far more interesting than Harris. Columbus copied everything from the books at the expense of propb68er character development, inspired direction, and originality. JK Rowling is good, but her writing fell apart in the last few books. God awful writing, god awful plotting. Yates & co improved on her lazy authorship.

INSIGHTFUL SAYINGS!

Chris Columbus is the series worst director? Harris is a frail, crappy old dumbledore? I'd laugh in your face if I was talking to you in person. Columbus followed the books THE BEST compared to any of the other directors and Harris portrayed Dumbledore to a T. The only way you'd think the way you do is if you did NOT read the books. If you DID read the booksread them again.

Ha. Chris Columbus is the series' worst director, and Harris is a frail, crappy old Dumbledore.

INSIGHTFUL SAYINGS!

"They follow them quite closely, actually. All the major plot points are always there"
That statement is an insult to the books. Sorcerers Stone and Chamber of Secrets not withstanding (Thank you Chris Columbus and Harris)
Do or do not, there is no try - Yoda

"Dumbledore is written into The Deathly Hallows book but since when do the movies really follow the books?"
They follow them quite closely, actually. All the major plot points are always there.

Dumbledore is written into The Deathly Hallows book but since when do the movies really follow the books?