<![CDATA[She should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actress in 1939. The nominees that year in that category were Hattie]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Margaret Hamilton

julierom — 9 years ago(May 26, 2016 11:04 PM)

She should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actress in 1939. The nominees that year in that category were Hattie McDaniel and Olivia deHaviilland (both for Gone With the Wind), Geraldine Fitzgerald (Wuthering Heights), Edna May Oliver (Drums Along the Mohawk) and Maria Ouspenskaya (Love Affair). McDaniel and deHavilland deserved their nods but Hamilton could easily have taken the place of the other three in that category. But Hollywood and people didn't appreciate then what a classic and how iconic the film and the characters would become! Hamilton, who was actually a kind, gentle lady in real life will be forever remembered as "The Wicked Witch of the West"!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/98313/she-should-have-been-nominated-for-best-supporting-actress-in-1939-the-nominees-that-year-in-that-category-were-hattieRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 14:06:27 GMTWed, 15 Apr 2026 21:32:00 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to She should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actress in 1939. The nominees that year in that category were Hattie on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:32:01 GMT]]>BenHur59 — 9 years ago(October 21, 2016 09:35 AM)

Concur.
Maria Ouspenskaya was always just herself.
Hamilton should have been nominated instead.
However, Hattie McDaniel was the only choice to win it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/944646https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/944646Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:32:01 GMT