<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[George Miller: Exceptional director]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — George Miller</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>BirdmanT7</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 18, 2015 04:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">George Miller has proved at 70 years of age to return to the action genre by going old school with no CGI tricks, but also to make a masterpiece with "Fury Road". He is the truly the exceptional director of our time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/99417/george-miller-exceptional-director</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 18:01:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/99417.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:06:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to George Miller: Exceptional director on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:06:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rascal67</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 29, 2015 03:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Considering the budget he worked with on MAD MAX-79' and what he ended up giving us and the kinetic energy of the film, he did remarkably well. He was in top form with MAD MAX 2-81', and I feel this was worthy of a Best Picture nod. It set a benchmark for futuristic action films and I have never forgotten the first time I saw it at the cinema. I also enjoy WITCHES OF EASTWICK-87' and while a change of pace for him, it is an 80's cult favorite for many. As for BABE: PIG IN THE CITY and HAPPY FEET, not my thing really; but still very well done and popular.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/952470</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/952470</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:06:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to George Miller: Exceptional director on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:06:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WilliBerg</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 16, 2015 07:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The first Mad Max was fan5b4tastic for a first time feature director with a low-budget and its impact is undeniable. For its genre, Happy Feet is a great achievement and deservedly gave Miller an Oscar for animated movie. Witches of Eastwick is also great for what it is- a big budget mainstream Hollywood movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/952469</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/952469</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:06:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to George Miller: Exceptional director on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:06:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Nriks</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 18, 2015 04:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Too hit and miss for me. The first Mad Max is nothing special and Happy Feet isn't my cup of tea, but Mad Max 3, Witches of Eastwick, Babe: Pig in the City and Happy Feet 2 are all pretty crappy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/952468</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/952468</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:06:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>