Think he did it?
-
LadyGodiva1977 — 20 years ago(August 05, 2005 07:59 AM)
I Don't think he did it buti think he knows who did it or knows somthing about it he is just not saying but then again he morer than likely paid someone to do it actors could do somthing like that.hey if ya got the money i personally would go shopping but others choose to kill thier spouses
.. -
littleprettyone — 20 years ago(October 18, 2005 09:06 AM)
I've read the case, and I don't doubt he did it, just like OJ did. I hope they get the bastard in the civil case n take him for every penny he's got. And before someone jumps on this n5b4 says what bout the poor kid, that child should've bin taken away when her mother died.
Don't get me wrong, from what I've read, Bonny wasn't the greatest of people, but she didn't deserve what she got.
The Bride: You and I have unfinished business.
Bill: Baby, you ain't kidding. -
littleprettyone — 20 years ago(October 19, 2005 11:39 AM)
I know, the OJ money thing is an absolute disgrace. That guy is as guilty as they come, but then he crawls off to Florida where they can't touch his NFL pension. Bastard. I hope one day his kids realise what he did to their mother, and deal him out the harshest punishment of all by disowning him. He's scum.
The Bride: You and I have unfinished business.
Bill: Baby, you ain't kidding. -
SheBear — 20 years ago(November 03, 2005 08:40 AM)
Personally I don't think he did it. It's all a little too obvious you know? It seems the guy has always had a voliatile personality which could explain why he doesn't come off as the most sympathetic character. He never denied that he married Blakely strictly because of the baby so if he never loved her and grew to despise her when he found out about her past it stands to reason that he wouldn't be particularly saddened by her death and that he would be angered by being accused of something he didn't do. I don't believe in knocking the victim but in this case Blakely's past is incredibly relevant since her lifestyle led to MANY people that could have wanted her dead.
But aside from all that and more importantly - there was enough reasonable doubt to not convict him. -
marbleann — 20 years ago(October 21, 2005 09:05 PM)
I came over here because the person Robert Balke replaced in the Little Rascals died today and I wanted to check on something and I saw this. I think he did it. I believe one of the reasons he was not guilty is once again the DA blew it. They presented the case as a muder for hire case. The DA for some reason stuck with theory that Blake actually paid a few guys to kill his wife. But the problem was the people the DA thought were the hitmen were a bunch of guys that no o238ne could believe would be capbable of shooting decoy duck no less a real person. One was some guy that use to be a stunt man who might have been alive during the Revolutionary war. One was a hope to die dope fiend. I think no hit men were invloved and he shot his wife all by himself. Just like I think OJ killed his wife and the other guy by himself. I think he had to shoot her when he got back or shot her right before he left to retrieve his gun from the resturant. He just used another gun.
Even though I feel he and OJ are killers it is the DA'sb68 who seem to make these crazy glaring mistakes. We should really express our anger with them. Also I think in California the jury's seem to be very star struck. I still can't believe the way Michael Jackson got off either. But I think the combination of star struck juries and hasty DA's is a recipe for disaster for the People and success for the famous defendants. -
littleprettyone — 20 years ago(October 22, 2005 06:23 AM)
Totally agree with you marbleann. You made some excellent points there. I don't really have anything to add to what you said, because you summed it up well, but I just wanted to post to say I think you're right. The DA screwed up another one. These days it seems like you can slice up your wife and her friend, shoot her at alarmingly close range, or even abuse little boys, and as long as a jury will recognise you, you'll get off. It's an absolute disgrace.
The Bride: You and I have unfinished business.
Bill: Baby, you ain't kidding. -
marbleann — 20 years ago(October 22, 2005 02:34 PM)
Thanks. I live in NY and we have our problems with some jury's too, but I have never seen the idolitry California Jury's have for these celebs. When Russell Crowe threw that phone at the hotel clerk here the first thing I thought was he is stupider then I thought because if he wanted to assault a innocent person he should of waited until he got to California to do it because over here we do convict celebrities. Martha Stewart can attest to that. And there is no doubt in my mind that Crowe will go to jail if he doesn't take a plea. Everything was on video. In NY we think of movie stars to be spoiled brats. We tend to let the Mafia/gangster types off here, they are our equivilent to movie stars.
-
bldschwl — 20 years ago(March 21, 2006 08:12 AM)
do i think he did it, YES
robert blake is an idiot, didnt he say that
"he left his gun in the resturant"
i think the only reason he got off, was the
fact that the jury HATED bonnie, she was a
con artist & golddigger
*In 1989, she was convicted of drug possession
*In television interviews, one of her children
claimed that Bakley entered her and her siblings
into prostitution while they were minors.
*running a lonely hearts scheme, sending nude
pictures of herself to men with the promise of
visiting them if they sent her money.
*Her friends and relatives all described her as "celebrity-obsessed".
She claimed to have had an affair with rock legend Jerry Lee Lewis and
borne his child, but DNA tests later disproved her claim. Lewis has denied
ever having a relationship with Bakley. Tapes of Bakley's phone conversations
reveal that she was starstruck and bent on marrying someone famous. "I like
being around celebrities," she once said, "it makes you feel better than other
people."