There were witnesses who claimed he tried to hire them to kill her. Plus, gunshot residue was found on Blake's hands.
-
The_Dougster — 9 years ago(May 28, 2016 08:15 AM)
OK, this is basically us repeating the same thing over and over again. I also think he had a hand in her death. I can't say whether or not the verdict in the criminal trial was correct because I saw none of it. In the O.J. Simpson trial, I followed it enough to see that he was clearly guilty, the jury's verdict notwithstanding. I watched it until I got so sick of it that it's with reservation that I even bring it up
now
! I'm
certainly
not watching any of that mini-series they're showing about it now! Back to Blake, what I don't get is how you've seen enough evidence to think he had a hand in his wife's death but you think "they had zilch" on him. You think the legal system owes him an
apology
! Did I read you correctly there? And this spiel you're giving me about motive is pretty silly. The boyfriend or husband are not always charged with murder in cases like these. Blake's attorney admitted that he had motive to
MURDER HER
. I think you're confused about motive here. You're acting like anyone who
EVER
fought with their significant other has inherent motive to
KILL THEM
! As far as "the testimony of witnesses who are perceived criminals" goes, we've been through that over and over again. The title of this thread is "Think he did it?". You say you believe he had a hand in it, yet at the same time you call it one of the weakest cases ever brought to trial. Surely you can see the contradictions in your argument. -
GetOffMyLawn — 9 years ago(May 28, 2016 06:50 PM)
You say you believe he had a hand in it, yet at the same time you call it one of the weakest cases ever brought to trial. Surely you can see the contradictions in your argument.
It wab68s a weak case. Doesn't mean I think he's innocent, just indicates the evidence seem very inadequate. I don't mind if he did it or not, she's one less gold digger in the world. -
The_Dougster — 9 years ago(May 29, 2016 08:36 PM)
There are many annoying or otherwise undesirable characteristics displayed by certain people. That doesn't mean their lives are worthless and/or they don't deserve justice when something like this happens? So, basically, you're saying you don't care
who
killed this woman and you're glad she's dead. Is that about right? -
GetOffMyLawn — 9 years ago(May 30, 2016 02:23 PM)
I'm not trying to be funny at all. Why should I or anyone else sympathize with her when she used her life to scheme others out of money? Women like her that could give a sh!t less about anyone but themselves don't merit sympathy. She contributed nothing positive that I can tell. She was too lazy to find a real job and expected a man to pay for her extravagant lifestyle. She manipulated others for her own benefit, not someone I would waste my compassion on.
-
GetOffMyLawn — 9 years ago(May 31, 2016 05:01 AM)
Have I not made it clear by now that I could care less? Why should it bother me? She was a stranger that played with fire and it came back and bit her in the ass. I could understand if it was tragic, but I don't consider it that unfortunate. Even if he did kill her I doubt he'll do it again. I say thumbs up, one less gold digging whore in the world. Now if others would follow lead and whack the rest of em'
. -
The_Dougster — 9 years ago(May 31, 2016 05:39 PM)
Yeah, you've made it clear. I just wasn't sure if this was dead serious or was to be taken "tongue-in-cheek". That's pretty cold that you don't think that even a gold-digger deserves some kind of justice. Why should it bother you?
Maybe
because being a gold-digger isn't a capital offense. Just sayin, man! Even a "gold digging whore" deserves
some
justice. -
GetOffMyLawn — 9 years ago(May 31, 2016 08:12 PM)
I know it may seem a little harsh but that's how I feel
. Outside of family and close friends, people's death never affected me unless it was innocent children being murdered or molested and the elderly being mistreated. -
gs-web — 10 years ago(December 28, 2015 11:12 AM)
My opinion is that most people don't start committing murders when they are in their mid 60s. He is an actor and the public confused his acting with who he really was as a man. In one of those highly publicized cases that was gone over and over with a fine tooth comb, Blake was never found to have been abusive, to have beat anyone, molested anyone, or done anything more than just having an abrasive personality here and there.
The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. Robert Blake had not lived a life filled with scams and problems. His dead wife, though, had been a scam artist that had trapped him in a marriage he didn't want. He married her out of love for that baby. She could have been murdered by any number of men, because she had scammed and cheated many, many men.
Bonnie's children, of course, don't want to think of their mother in that light, so they have pretty much rewritten history to make their mother faultless and Blake the boogie man. Its really a shame all of this has happened. He was found not guilty in the criminal trial and then lost everything he ever earned in a career that lasted longer than 50 years. -
prolia705 — 10 years ago(December 28, 2015 08:15 PM)
that is what I think too.
he hired somebody,that is why there was no gun residue evidence.
Furthermore he didn't even want the baby and told Bonnie to abort it.
He is as guilty as the civil jury said he was.
And dat's the name of dat tune! You can take dat to the bank!