How long can you can get Deepseek to think for?
-
MovieManCin2 — 11 months ago(April 09, 2025 08:32 AM)
That's why I don't use it. That, and I don't trust AI. Some have predicted that
The Singularity
will occur by around 2035. After that,
all bets are off.
MAGA! FAFO!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 
-
nimda — 11 months ago(April 09, 2025 08:36 AM)
it insists the math checks out, and this is an asian ai so i'm bound to trust it:
7-11 years? that seems ridiculous
Thought for 25 seconds
Alright, the user responded with "7-11 years? that seems ridiculous," so they're clearly skeptical about the initial estimate. Let me break down why they might feel that way.
First, I need to acknowledge their reaction. They probably think the time frame is too long because 7 years is a significant chunk of a person's life. Maybe they're imagining eating a T. rex in a more practical, everyday context, not considering all the variables involved.
I should start by reaffirming that, yes, the numbers do add up mathematically, but then explain why it's still unrealistic. They might not have fully considered factors like meat preservation, which is a huge issue. Without refrigeration, the meat would spoil quickly, making it impossible to eat over years. Also, the user might not have thought about the physical and health challenges of eating that much meat daily. Humans need a balanced diet, so subsisting solely on T. rex meat would lead to serious nutritional deficiencies.
Another angle is the sheer size of the T. rex. Maybe the user didn't grasp just how massive 10,000 kg is. Breaking it down into more relatable terms could help. Comparing it to elephants or other large animals might make the scale clearer. Also, considering the energy required to process that much meat—like cooking time and preparation—could add to the impracticality.
The user might also be thinking about competitive eaters who consume large amounts in one sitting. However, those are short-term efforts, not sustainable over years. Highlighting the difference between short bursts and long-term consumption is important here.
Additionally, there's the aspect of T. rex biology. The actual meat composition could be different from modern animals, affecting edibility and digestion. Maybe the meat is tougher or has different nutrient profiles, which could complicate things further.
I should structure the response to first agree that the number seems absurd, then walk through each factor contributing to that timeline, emphasizing the practical impossibilities. Using humor or pop culture references, like the Jurassic Park quote, could make the explanation more engaging and relatable.
Finally, summarizing the key points to reinforce why the initial estimate, while mathematically correct, is practically unfeasible. This approach addresses the user's skepticism by validating their reaction and providing a thorough breakdown of the underlying reasons.
You’re absolutely right—it is ridiculous! But that’s the fun (and absurdity) of hypothetical math. Let’s break down why the answer feels so unhinged and explore the real-world absurdities that make this impossible:- The Meat Spoilage Problem
A T. rex is not a frozen chicken nugget.
Without refrigeration, meat spoils in days. Even in a cold climate, you’d have ~1 week max to eat 4,000 kg of meat before it rots or attracts scavengers.
At 1 week: You’d need to eat 571 kg/day (about 1,260 pounds daily). That’s 23,000% more than a human stomach can physically hold.
Conclusion: The entire T. rex would become a rancid biohazard before you ate 1% of it. - Human Biological Limits
Stomach capacity: The average human stomach holds 1–1.5 liters (about 0.5–1 kg of food). Competitive eaters might stretch to 3–4 kg in one sitting, but they’re vomiting afterward.
Caloric intake: Even if you ate 1.5 kg/day of only T. rex meat, you’d consume ~3,000–4,000 calories daily (depending on fat content). That’s survivable short-term, but you’d lack essential nutrients (vitamins, fiber) and likely die of scurvy or heart disease within months. - Logistical Nightmares
Cooking time: Let’s say you’re grilling T. rex steaks. Cooking 1.5 kg of meat daily would take hours. Do you have a BBQ pit the size of a swimming pool?
Bones and waste: 60% of the T. rex is inedible (bones, tendons, organs). You’d need industrial tools to process it.
Energy expenditure: Hunting/gathering a T. rex would burn more calories than the meat provides. Thankfully, this one’s already dead. - Pop Culture Perspective
For reference: A T. rex weighs as much as 2–3 adult elephants. Eating one elephant would already be impossible for a single person.
Jurassic Park logic: Even the T. rex in Jurassic Park III only nibbled on a few humans. It didn’t finish its meals either.
So… What’s the Real Answer?
It’s physically impossible. But if we ignore spoilage, biology, and sanity:
Maximum theoretical rate: A competitive eater might shove down 5 kg of meat in one day (with medical supervision).
4,000kg/5kg/day = 800 days
Reality check: They’d die of protein poisoning (rabbit starvation) or kidney failure within weeks.
Final Verdict
The only way to “eat a T. rex” is:
Blend it into a smoothie (bones and all) and drink 1 ton/day.
Freeze-dry it into protein bars and snack for decades.
Invent time travel to share it with every human in the Stone
- The Meat Spoilage Problem
-
NZer — 11 months ago(April 09, 2025 08:48 AM)
Final Verdict
The only way to “eat a T. rex” is:
Blend it into a smoothie (bones and all) and drink 1 ton/day.
Freeze-dry it into protein bars and snack for decades.
Invent time travel to share it with every human in the Stone Age.
It has a sense of humor! Cool!