George Michael shows greather originality
-
citizen_zensin — 18 years ago(July 02, 2007 11:12 PM)
I seriously doubt any of you have read LordoftheFlies and the beach. They have similarites but rip off is a ignorant thing to say.
i'll admit the coma was tedious due to lack of caring about hte character
and tesseract wasn't that great
but the beach was amazingly brilliant. It was succint and thought-provoking. There wasn't a sentence in there that didn't belong.
If you only read the book once you missed alot. I suggest you read it a couple more times, it's worth it. -
UVRayz — 18 years ago(September 26, 2007 06:53 PM)
I don't find any of his work tedious and I don't care if he borrows from others. His prose is enjoyable to read and I've found all of his books thought provoking. I wish he wasn't focusing on screenplays. I think he's more talented as a novelist. Then again, I think Danny Boyle is one of the best out there, and if he needs Alex to partner with, then so be it.
-
coolworld — 17 years ago(December 24, 2008 08:11 PM)
Exactly! Lord of the Flies and The Beach have very few things in common. People say that because some critics compared the two books, so now everybody acts like they read them both.
In any case, I see nothing wrong in being influenced by great novels or f2000ilms.
.Brain is a muscle. Use it or lose it. -
cherzo — 18 years ago(June 07, 2007 11:16 PM)
another idiot who makes a comment then doesnt contribute agai to the discussion, as somebody said previously every movie is influenced by other movies/stories, just look at the mess that hollywood throws out these days ad you will see.
-
stephenmonachello — 18 years ago(March 08, 2008 08:25 PM)
If you are going to trash Garland, at least learn to spell greater right.
http://www.imdb.com/board/22604794/ -
mecfc — 18 years ago(March 13, 2008 04:35 PM)
Garland is a one-hit wonder novelist who got lucky riffing off other materials and being clever enough to put a topical enough spin on the ideas of others to pass them off as his own. So the satire of Romero becomes the blunt force of 28 Days Later, the claustrophobic isolation of Alien and Solaris (and, to a lesser extent, Outland) becomes the cliches and stock structure of Sunshine. That's not to say they're bad films, my opinion is that Boyle irons in the subtleties, where the screenplay often - being seemingly on rails - only sketches.
-
jaden165 — 17 years ago(May 25, 2008 07:13 AM)
mecfc Its easy to play the unoriginal card, it can be used on any writer, someone could say night of the living dead is not original because Romero took the concept of zombies from vodu tales, I think Garland is a very good writer, 28 Days Later helped revamp the zombie horror genre.
It is not possible Alien and Solaris borrowed aspects of 2001 a space odyessey and developed them further. I respect your opinion but I do not agree with it. -
MrOstrich — 17 years ago(June 04, 2008 12:44 PM)
fantastic! A 2 page debate. I only haven't come back sooner as it took so long to get a single response. I enjoyed 28 Days/Weeks Later but there are influences of other works at play, nobody can deny that.
I wasn't trashing Garland as someone pointed out, all writers are influenced by one thing or another, but few with as much consistency!
Cambridge man you know. His uncle Bertie and I used to break wind for our college.