Why does he have a Nobel Prize?
-
BearsCubs — 17 years ago(November 18, 2008 08:57 AM)
"because he said, "the glaciers are melting" "
No, no, no! That's not it. It's because he said, "the planet has a fever".
This guy is running a ponzie scheme and I think people are finally waking up to that fact. -
jon-gwynne — 17 years ago(November 15, 2008 09:04 AM)
Hey, but Menachem Begin did actually make peace with Egypt so I think that washed a little of the blood off his hands (just a little).
A good plan today is better than a perfect plan tomorrow. - David Mamet
-
prez4lifehobbes — 18 years ago(November 07, 2007 08:10 PM)
Why do the 'Oil' Companies get away with Price Gouging(1), Collusion(2), and Technology Suppression(3)? All of which are Illegal "LAST TIME I CHECKED". Why haven't We done anything about it? Because we can afford itBecause we have become a Nation of ostriches? At least He, in a position to do so Does, where as we as a whole pick our nose and say 'WHY SHOULD HE GET A NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FOR TRYING TO EDUCATE THE MASSES' wheres the "strategery" in that?
1.
CLICK ME
2.
CLICK ME ALSO
3.
CLICK ME AS WELL
all the laws above are WEAK SAUCE, you would think in a country like AMERICA we could do better, set a better example at the very least.
YOUR MAMMA -
robertmike57 — 18 years ago(November 09, 2007 09:56 AM)
I'm no fan of Gore, its easy to point out he's a phony. And it can be fairly debated whether he deserved the Nobel Prize.
But bringing the issue of Global Warming to a discussion is fully within the paramaeters for which to consider for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize. This does meet the qualification of working for the fraternity between nations. It is irefutable that the earth is warming and that man is playing a role in that warming with much higher atomospheric CO2 over the last 250 years. This is going to lay the foundations for potential future wars and armed conflicts. -
andrewwjohnson — 18 years ago(November 25, 2007 12:07 AM)
Should Al Gore deserve the Nobel Prize Peace Prize. Conceder two other people who were nominated. One was a Buddhist monk who is using passive resistence to bring democracy to Burma or what ever the thugs in the military dictatorship, that currently runs that nation, are calling it now. The other was a Polish women, now in her ninties, who saved thousands of Jewish children from the Nazis, during World War Two, by placing them with Catholic families. She kept the secret, of where she placed the children, even when she was picked up by the SS and tortured, and did everthing she could, after the war, to make sure they were reunited with whatever was left of their families. Either one of these people deserved the Nobel Peace Prize more the Al Gore.
Just remember: I was as good as any and better then most-Vincent Freeman in Gattaca -
pgrass13 — 18 years ago(December 18, 2007 12:51 AM)
Yes
The PEACE prize for one should go to someone who brings peace to nations. Al Gore did not do this he didn't even bring peace to the US if anything he brought more division. Secondly, if a nobel prize of science were to go to anyone for global warming shouldn't it be the scientists who studied it. Personally I think global warming is an exageration to begin with. Anyway that other lady mentioned deserved it way more. Seriously it is just a publicity stint any more and Al Gore has one of the biggest heads out there when it comes to wanting attention.
Same thing we do every night try to take over the world -
arorashadow_2003 — 17 years ago(May 14, 2008 07:22 PM)
Al Gore robbed one of the lost heroes of WWII, I never even knew about her to I saw a small segment on her on Glenn Beck!
Gore's mansion has a far higher carbon footprint than George W. Bush's Texas Ranch!
Anime is Forever