Jim Kelly Vs. Chuck Norris
-
Nic_hse — 18 years ago(December 08, 2007 03:15 AM)
{{Who the Hell in the right mind would play a con game for $2.00. - that hardly covers the damn shipping.))
Bwah ha ha. Who indeed fool. You're about to get owned easily so pay attention. Don't worry Tim. I'll make it so easy even moron like you could understand it but try to keep up.
Apparently you're not in your right mind because you are:- A person too stupid to figure out he could use a library scanner and computer for free. (Man that was dumb)
- A person too dumb to come up with a better excuse (Any 10 year old can con better).
- A person too foolish figure out he's setting himself up to get owned. (You should have saw this coming and quit while you were ahead)
No I can't put the stupidity of a $2.00 con game past you after these 3 mistakes Hoss. Now go hang your head in shame. Too easy.
Another moron added to my IGNORE LIST.(check my profile 'Po' Whiteboy', Fool, Hoss, Tim, Who cares?!!). See you never!!! Next!!
-
vancleefkillskinski — 15 years ago(October 21, 2010 09:03 PM)
Chuck in 1970 vs Jim in 1970. I got to go with Chuck. He was world champ. I think more than once. But then, Charles Bronson comes along and beats the hell out of both of them. And then Henry Silva shows up and screams muther fuc!er!!! And shoots everyone!!! But never fear, Lee Van Cleef chuckles, lights his pipe and shoots down Henry Silva. The end. Lee Van Cleef would win against everyone.