how sad
-
-
lavender8787 — 19 years ago(October 25, 2006 02:43 PM)
I think that's pretty good, because I've always heard they don't have to pay you anything for nonspeaking parts. But that's usually just the extras, they get other perks besides money. I assume they paid him that much because he was the main character. Even though, like the other person said, he was only in about 3 1/2 minutes of the movie.
-
-
Coqui80 — 19 years ago(November 02, 2006 05:03 AM)
As a struggling actor I've done a lot of extra work. There are some extra parts you do get paid for, by the day, and others are non-paid and you're only there for the experience. There aren't really any perks associated with extra work beyond having to sit around on a set for 14 hours feeling bored and sweating off your make-up!
"It's alligator, darlin'al-li-gator" -
Jackbornw — 17 years ago(June 02, 2008 05:38 PM)
Considering the total budget for this film.I would guess that his pay was in line with what he did. He's only in the film for a few seconds and it's not like he did anything worth more. He took a mask off and put it back on. How hard can that be?
The last time I checked, Nick Castle was (mainly) Michael Myers in Halloween and Dick Warlock was Michael Myers is Halloween II. This Tony Moran guy is milking his very very very very short appearance in this film for everything he can..that is what is truely sad! -
Fear-NoEvil — 15 years ago(September 16, 2010 03:51 PM)
He was only in a one minute scene. Nick Castle was Michael Myers 99 percent of the movie. Moran was only used for a minute for his face when the mask was pulled off. He did not do anything else as Michael.
-
Fear-NoEvil — 14 years ago(September 04, 2011 11:15 PM)
$250.00 does seem more correct than $25.00. Remember too he was NOT Michael Myers. he was a stand in for the scene where he had the mask pulled off his face simply because they did not believe Nick Castle who was Michael Myers had the "face" they envisioned for Michael Myers.