Jesse Ventura Owned Him
-
SeasonalAffective — 13 years ago(January 14, 2013 04:59 PM)
Good job avoiding my last post's points.
He didn't back down in terms of the argument. Again, you think that Jesse trying to scare his debating opponents is a virtuous thing (you said the same thing about Norton, even though Norton didn't back down). You're basically admitting that Ventura had no valid points, and that he resorted to trying to "alpha male" the other person. That's exactly what Norton says. We're all in agreement! I also agree with Norton that being bigger or trying to intimidate someone physically doesn't in any way make your points correct. Quite the contrary, actually, so thanks for boosting my argument.
Oh yeah, he wasn't a SEAL either. Cheers! -
SeasonalAffective — 13 years ago(January 14, 2013 05:09 PM)
Don't switch the subject.
And you're totally wrong; he challenged Ventura on his claims and Ventura either backtracked and changed them (that speaks well for his stances!) or he just asked question back in an attempt to deflect (like you're doing, and like Norton called him out on).
This is getting too easy for me. Every time you write something, I immediately shoot down all your points with logic and with the truth. I've come to the conclusion that you're a troll. If you're not, you've been discredited 3 times in the last 20 minutes anyway, so I'm not wasting any more time on you.
Let the people on this board read and judge for themselves. Sorry, but you suck! -
galahadfairlight — 13 years ago(January 18, 2013 03:03 AM)
Well aren't you the pleasant guy to have a chat with?
Any chance you could practice a bit of diplomacy, or does the twat mentality always endear you in a conversation.
He's certainly won more debates on TV than he's lost, and i'm sorry, can you explain the relevance of describing someone as 'half the size' as having ANY kind of relevance in this discussion? I'm not aware that Ventura physically threatens all his opponents unless they agree with him.
This signature has stupidity! -
SeasonalAffective — 13 years ago(January 18, 2013 03:25 PM)
Then you obviously haven't seen the debate between him and Jim Norton, which means you have no idea what you're talking about in the context of where this thread as led to, which means you should piss off because you've contributed nothing.
-
galahadfairlight — 13 years ago(January 18, 2013 04:54 PM)
Then you obviously haven't seen the debate between him and Jim Norton,
Obviously not, seen plenty of others which prove my point though.
which means you have no idea what you're talking about in the context of where this thread as led to,
Lead to? Hardly, you're not the OP, you don't get to determine the direction period.
which means you should piss off because you've contributed nothing.
Tact and diplomacy taking a back seat to your breadth of debating 'skills' I see.
You do1908n't get it do you champ, you could be 10000% correct, but if you're going to be a complete TWAT about it, no-ones going to see anything but YOU being a complete TWAT.
Somebody needs to grow the fvck up, and that champ, would be you.
This signature has stupidity! -
SeasonalAffective — 13 years ago(January 18, 2013 05:17 PM)
Not exactly; the debate vs Norton disproves your point entirely. Sorry to burst your bubble.
I can "determine" where the thread led to when I use my eyes my brain. Apparently, you aren't able to do this, or fathom others doing it either.
Your entire response was a fail. Thanks for trying. -
galahadfairlight — 13 years ago(January 19, 2013 04:20 AM)
Not exactly; the debate vs Norton disproves your point entirely.
Not really, you've brought up one example, still say Ventura wins more than he loses.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
You didn't.
I can "determine" where the thread led to when I use my eyes my brain.
Eyes maybe, but i'll stop you there at 'brain', because some of its cognitive functions appear to be not working very well, so much as I can 'determine'.
Apparently, you aren't able to do this, or fathom others doing it either.
Really? Was that before or after you quit the discussion because with that other guy because you weren't doing very well!
Your entire response was a fail.
Clearly not.
Thanks for trying.
Hardly breaking a sweat, just waiting for you to respond with 'douchebag' and we have the full complement of fail from you. oh, you already did that didn't you champ!
This signature has stupidity! -
SeasonalAffective — 13 years ago(January 19, 2013 01:27 PM)
The point wasn't that he wins more or loses more (the two I saw, however, he lost in). The point was that when he loses, he reverts to trying to alpha male/bully other people, which shows a serious lack of character and lack of confidence in one's arguments. Again: the Norton debate proved that.
I also never quit any discussion "because I wasn't doing well" and you know it. I stopped responding to someone after I easily proved him wrong 3 times in a row, and didn't want to waste any more time. Unfortunately, you've come along and wasted my time instead.
Again, you've proven nothing. -
galahadfairlight — 13 years ago(January 21, 2013 07:11 AM)
Ah bless, concentrate on the grammar because you have nothing else.
Nothing wrong with my grammar champ, but of course, concentrate on that, and not the discussion at hand, because being insular is such a WIN!!!
Still, it could be worse, you could still be using 'douchebag' as a insult oh dear, you are still!
This signature has stupidity! -
The-Last-Prydonian — 12 years ago(February 24, 2014 08:00 PM)
That's an insult?!
Plenty of grown adults use emoticons as would be witnessed on here if you had the brain capacity to notice.
You have a nerve to question anyone's maturity when all you have done is insult anyone who has dared to disagree with you!
It's hardly seems surprising that you would be kissing Norton's rear end as it seems you both have a lot in common. You both have serious insecurity complexes which manifest themselves in the hostility that you display to others. You're just an insecure little nobody like Norton, a man (if you can call him that) who Isn't even talented enough to be an a-list celebrity.
If anyone has any sense they'd do the sensible thing and ignore you completely. Oh and don't bother to reply because I don't bother to deal with ignoramus's like you any more than I have to! -
galahadfairlight — 12 years ago(March 12, 2014 06:15 PM)
Ah, another Internet Tough Guy. So impressive!
Coming from the guy thats tried that one and spectacularly lost, its refreshing at least when you can recognise that someone can do something you can't.
Still acting like a complete twat I see consistent at least!
This signature has stupidity! -
galahadfairlight — 12 years ago(March 13, 2014 01:30 AM)
There's never anything wrong with my spelling and grammar champ, its amusing how you still cling onto that as an arguing pointI goes that means you don't have to focus on the issues at hand if you do
As for being idiotic, I'm writing this post down to your level, I'm not surprised you got that.
Hey what's with the emoticons? Should I question your age or something?
This signature has stupidity!