it's pathetic. I mean, come on. what do you're going to spend your whole life, literally, until you fall down dead worki
-
kya1 — 10 years ago(January 16, 2016 01:02 PM)
It's up to her when she retires, if she wants to keep working, that's her choice.
I'm sure she spends time with her loved ones in between acting projects. Everyone should keep active to stay mentally and physically fit/alert.
You're a long time dead!! -
dini0519 — 10 years ago(January 16, 2016 04:22 PM)
I'm not a careerist and preferred being a full-time mother when my kids were small, but it's Betty's right to work as long as she is able to and wants to. You've got to remember she does have an exciting acting career that pays well and is not just a minimum wage office or retail worker. Her husband is dead, she 1c84doesn't have children, and she seems to be enjoying herself.
Dini -
-
NostalgiasForGeeks — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 09:04 PM)
I'm sorry, I don't say this often, but your opinion is really stupid. Morals aren't universal. Your belief system is yours and only yours. Stating something like "working into your old age is wrong" as fact doesn't make it so.
Honestly, I have no clue why you would even feel that working into your 90's would be "immoral". Immoral? Really? There's literally no logic or sense to it.
What, people like Betty should be confined to a rocking chair in front of their tv set for the rest of their lives, even if they're healthy and still want to be active, just because you say so?
No.
As for sex.. puhleez. TONS OF OLD PEOPLE HAVE SEX. TONS! If you think it's rare then you're incredibly niave. Why do you think there's viagra commercials every 10 minutes on TV?
*With her alive-nostrils once snaggle front-tooth crossinda0g the other and wear bangs -InherentlyYours -
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 01:11 AM)
you're nave thinking that Viagra commercials are for 70 and above people, now that is stupid and ignorant. you are really stupid. this moral is universal because it's people spending time with other people who are in the same immediate family.
-
Keelai — 10 years ago(January 16, 2016 05:54 PM)
She obviously loves working so why not? It makes more sense to spend your life doing what you enjoy rather than stay home and be miserable. She always looks like she's having a ball when she's on talk shows. I know that I enjoy watching her.
-
BestOfAllPossible — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 10:55 AM)
If we're really going to get into this. "should have" is correct, not "should of." "Should have" is commonly abbreviated as "should've," which sounds like "should of," but that doesn't make "should of" correct.
-
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 05:31 PM)
not true. things change, words change and when something gets used enough it changes to a word and so has happened with should of. people became too lazy to use should have so then should of became correct grammar.