https://www.yahoo.com/news/anton-yelchin-lapd-confirms-details-200233170.html
-
Pohjanakka — 9 years ago(June 20, 2016 12:02 PM)
More likely, but people can also do really, really stupid things when they don't have the time to think about it but move on instinct.
One case I know of, I heard of it from her friend, was of a woman doing a paper route breaking her arm when she had stopped to put the morning paper into a mailbox without getting out of the car (the way they do it on country routes where I live, morning papers are put into the mailboxes which are on the side of the road so that the deliverers, both newspaper and mail, can do it without getting out of the car. Those cars belong to the company and the driver's side has been changed to the right).
So her car was on neutral and started to roll a bit, that mailbox was right next to the gate to the property and that gate had two big rock posts on both sides.
And because her hand was already out of the window she tried to get hold of the post. It broke like a twig. The car wasn't even yet moving fast at that moment, in fact it was moving hardly at all, but it was a big van.
Later she said that she had just not thought at all but had done it completely on instinct. So of course she had known she would not be able to stop the big van like that, but she just hadn't
thought
. At all. She had just moved. And realized the stupidity even before her arm broke, but at that moment it was already both too late for her to pull it back and too late to hit the brakes.
And btw, considering how much even smaller cars weight, it does not even need to hit you fast, if most of that weight comes to rest on some more vulnerable part of a puny little human - like maybe the rib cage - that human could be crushed to death by the weight alone. -
CorgiLobsterDog — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 01:41 AM)
This incident reminds me how I almost crashed my van when I Tried to take off a pull-over sweatshirt as I was driving. It got hung up around my big head I still get weak in the knees thinking about the stupidity of it, even decades later.
I just heard about Anton's death a few minutes ago. And I thought I was a Star Trek fan! I really thought he was a great Chechov. He made him funny and likable, but still super smart. Wow, It has really upset me, especially after learning the details.
cheers! -
Vibradiant — 9 years ago(June 19, 2016 04:27 PM)
TMZ links won't work, but easily found.
From the dent in the fence, and the position of the brick column, he was hit with tremendous force, and at very least, completely unable to breathe or move. Also it looks like an exclusive neighborhood where it wouldn't have been easily visible or heard by others.
Must have been absolutely terrifying last moments. RIP.
"I like to watch."
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There' -
rascal67 — 9 years ago(June 19, 2016 05:36 PM)
The "blame" game is about avoiding and going into denial about the "reality", "mishaps" and "sufferings" of life. It always has to be something else, or someone else. It just is most of the time. Yelchin may have simply forgotten to put on the park break, so his "own" actions had a consequence.
Exorcist: Christ's power compels you. Cast out, unclean spirit.
Destinata: -
rascal67 — 9 years ago(June 20, 2016 12:13 AM)
a new shifter design that was recalled because too many people were not engaging park probably
You mean the park break, if it was a manual vehicle? Or was it automatic? The car was found in neutral and the park break would have need been engaged regardless of the transmission, due to the slope.
Exorcist: Christ's power compels you. Cast out, unclean spirit.
Destinata: -
stevegrayston-75-221538 — 9 years ago(June 20, 2016 09:12 AM)
no i mean park on the shifter. yes it was found in neutral because park on the shifter wasnt selected because no doubt due to the design that makes it hard to know when you are in park or not and hense why it was recalled. yes he should of engaged the park break (handbreak ) but most autos can hold the car on a slope without the park break..
-
Vibradiant — 9 years ago(June 20, 2016 06:05 PM)
And it doesn't mean this wasn't a defective model, and it would be quite the coincidence that his jeep happens to be under recall for doing what killed him.
Your confident insistence that he was at fault is born of a twisted failure of logic and mean-spiritedness. Hopefully you will speak your ugly thoughts aloud to the right person irl and get what's coming.
"I like to watch."
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There' -
Vibradiant — 9 years ago(June 20, 2016 07:23 PM)
You asked a question, and I politely answered it.
You call ME dense? I have never asked you a question.
5b4
Don't insult me due to your insistence that we need to play the blame game.
You need to read your own words:
There was nothing defective about his vehicle. He made the mistake
Remember, short-term? You are the one playing the blame game.
YOU CANNOT PROVE the jeep was the cause.
And you cannot prove it WASN'T, but the recall coincidence is remarkable, and investigations will tell more. Given that you don't know one way or the other, why so quick to blame it on Anton? Probably because you are a prick.
"I like to watch."
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There' -
rascal67 — 9 years ago(June 21, 2016 05:08 AM)
Your confident insistence that he was at fault is born of a twisted failure of logic and mean-spiritedness.
Your confident insistence that he wasn't at fault is born of a twisted failure of grasping "reality" and pure-simplmindeness.
So if the vehicle was defective for the reasons of the recall, does that mean the parking\handbreak was too?
Exorcist: Christ's power compels you. Cast out, unclean spirit.
Destinata: -
Vibradiant — 9 years ago(June 21, 2016 10:53 AM)
Do you really set the handbrake every single time you put an automatic vehicle in park, esp if just hopping out for a minute? Also, "simplmindeness"? Id111ciot douchebag proves him/herself to be an idiot.
"I like to watch."
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'
