This message has been deleted.
-
Titanica19127136 — 18 years ago(September 10, 2007 12:11 AM)
What is wrong with you people?!?! Carrying on an absurd, childish fight for pages upon pages, over what exactly I lost track of after page 2 when it became clear that the original topic was completely lost in the sheer nonsense of it all, is really beyond me. Leave the cat fights and name-calling to little children, and act with a bit more maturity please.
As for the last comment made here, Camilla's maker is not "the devil," and she is not a "usurping whore [who] shouldn't be allowed out of her stable." She is a human being who deserves a little more respect than she has been getting on these boards, and you people really should not believe everything you read in magazines or see on television, because it's never the whole story anyway. -
Jackie-Kennedy — 18 years ago(September 12, 2007 03:54 AM)
Princess Diana has always been an inspiration to me even though I was only 11 when she died. She was a caring, selfless woman who just happened to also be human and have real human flaws. She wasn't perfect but who is. That she could see past her own problems and make time to help those less fortunate than she is admirable.
However that being said I think people are entirely too critical of Camilla.
Ok I'm going to throw myself to the dogs here and suggest that people are maybe a bit too quick to judge her.
I mean it was not hers and Charles fault they fell in love. You don't choose who you fall for. And they were together long before Diana. Thats not to say they should have continued as they did but I don't think it's as clear cut as people seem to think.
Charles and Diana didn't marry out of choice and perhaps Camilla would have made a better partnership. But the royals have diifferent ways of doing things and for what ever reason she just wasn't good enough then to be Queen.
To give him his due I think that Charles did try to work on the marriage at first but he just couldn't be w1354ithout Camilla and was every bit as unhappy as Diana. She needed him to love more than he was able. But he was already set in his ways and wasn't about to change.
And Diana, big a fan as I am, I feel was probably a little over sensitive to the situation, not her fault I hasten to add and I don't judge.As a resul tof her childhood she always demanded 100% from the men in her life and some are jsut better at giving it than others.
I think I have a broad enough view of the situation, enough to know she wasn't perfect but her good qualities outweighed the good. She did play the victim a bit but I think that was just her reactoin to being thrown into the deep of a situation she was too young to appreciate and understand.
Ok she didn't deserve the way in which some of Charles and Camilla's friends looked down their noses at her and made her feel an outcast, I won't deny that.
But the situation has two sides to it. Camilla is not a bad woman, she simply made mistakes where Diana and Charles's marriage and feelings were concerned. I don't believe that she or Charles went all out to hurt Diana.
I wish people would try to see both sides of the story instead of jumping on the "we hate Camilla" bandwagon.
Jacqueline Lee Bouvier Kennedy Onasis -
Magnetta101 — 18 years ago(December 06, 2007 04:19 PM)
You are superior in what way? Everyway!!! Another joke. Well you must be a uni student then or someone with a high profession because i am a student with a part time job and a life. Do you know what a life is?
MAKE LOVE NOT WAR!!! -
Magnetta101 — 18 years ago(December 07, 2007 01:27 AM)
'I left school a long time ago'
Obviously.
'Let's just say I could buy and sell you many times. And I'm allowed to correct your numerous mistakes.'
If your so professional then you wouldn't be wasting your time chatting onthese boards 24/7.
'sucking your toes is not a job'
No but waitressing is.
'oh future hustler'
Well seeing as some hustler's can make fools out of people easily i recon your spot on there.
MAKE LOVE NOT WAR!!!