Is he really considered 'Good Looking'??
-
HarveyManfredSinJohn — 10 years ago(January 29, 2016 03:18 AM)
The thing about him that annoys me is that he's trying to have it both ways.
Tim Canterbury, the Office character on which Jim Halpert was based, was never meant to be the good-looking office hottie/sport-star. He was meant to be the homely-looking Everyman.
And now John Krasinski clearly wants to be perceived as a Brad Pitt/Bradley Cooper action hero/leading man type, rather than someone who is more suited to goofy romantic comedies.
So which is it? Is he the Everyman or is he the matinee idol? Then again, maybe that's the problem; he's too attractive to play the former and perhaps no5b4t good-looking enough for the latter. -
miss_brightside77 — 10 years ago(February 02, 2016 02:57 PM)
I saw that written about him and I paused too. He's not ugly at all but, to me, he's more cute and than he is (what I consider) good-looking. He's attractive and has an actor's face but not really a heartthrob to me, which is fine!
-
klrweb — 10 years ago(February 18, 2016 01:16 PM)
His height certainly helps. I find him incredibly attractive, but I do agree that if he was short would I be that into him? No, probably not. Height itself is attractive to some people (especially when you are tall yourself, such as I am).
-