abigail breslin or chloe moretz
-
paulfitzpa — 11 years ago(November 07, 2014 04:14 PM)
Abigail = future Kirsten Dunst
Chloe = future Scarlett Johannson
Both have had huge careers, so that's a compliment I suspect. I think Abigail is more talented than Dunst though. Dunst has ruined a few films for me.
Both Abigail and Chloe have more acting experience than many actors twice their age. That is worth a lot. -
Ammarsaqib — 15 years ago(January 23, 2011 09:37 AM)
all though i prefer abigail as an actress but u cant argue that chloe has made very promising roles for a more mature career
chloe is going more towards jodie foster and natalie portmen route
i still remember "leon" made the same buzz for natalie as "kick ass" did for chloe
but miss breslin is also very good actress but she is a bit too traditional,she looksb68 to be the next "meryl streep" to me
ABS -
PimpSmackersGOM — 15 years ago(February 22, 2011 07:17 AM)
I like them both but I think the main difference between the two is that Abigail goes more for "cutesy" type roles. Even in the R rated Little Miss Sunshine, she played the adorable little girl role. Chloe has two upcoming movies called The Fields and Hick, where she plays a girl who gets murdered by a serial killer in one and a girl who gets raped in the other. I think it's fair to say that she's aiming for a Jodie Foster type of career with the choices she's making.
A superhero never reveals their true identity -
Ammarsaqib — 15 years ago(March 05, 2011 02:56 AM)
but the problem with chloe is if she keeps doing those kind of roles she wod be type casted,we dont want another dakota fanning,she must balance it with normal kids role or she wad be marked as a "gets killed girl"
ABS -
Jbrown4124 — 14 years ago(September 28, 2011 02:36 PM)
While I believe both will avoid the train wreck route of Ms. Lohan, I think Abigail will have a long career on screen and pretty much stay out of the tabloids. Chloe however will ave just as fruitful a screen career but somehow I get the feeling she'll be spending equal amount of time on the scandal sheet. You don't play those type of roles all the time without something of it rubbing off on you.
Agree 100 percent with what you said about Chloe, and TIFF has started it already. -
Jbrown4124 — 14 years ago(September 28, 2011 02:34 PM)
hloe has two upcoming movies called The Fields and Hick, where she plays a girl who gets murdered by a serial killer in one and a girl who gets raped in the other. I think it's fair to say that she's aiming for a Jodie Foster type of career with the choices she's making.
And Chloe got a lot of bad press for "Hick" at TIFF not just for her controversial role but for for other decisions she made at that festival. -
Ice-Ice-Baby — 14 years ago(August 11, 2011 11:58 AM)
@WarrioiPoets1, THANK YOU! I hate how people make comparisons but at the same time that's how it's always going to be, especially in the music, fashion, writing & film industry. It's like comparing apples to oranges, or peas to pods kinda thing. They're both equally good actresses & will both make it big.
Always Unique Totally Interesting Sometimes Mysterious. -
phogoodness — 14 years ago(April 14, 2011 06:46 AM)
I got to go with Chloe since she is doing bigger budgeted films with prominent directors and more mature roles. They are both great child actresses, but I think Chloe will transition better to adult roles once they reach those ages. I see Abigail as more of an indie-film actress.
Chloe is great though.