The Only Reason Proof Shot First.
-
Peter_Ian_Staker — 19 years ago(April 23, 2006 10:18 AM)
You really expect anyone to believe that a trained soldier had a gun already out but proof is so sk33led that he managed to pull his out faster than another man can simply pull a trigger? And why the hell did he pistol whip him then? If someone has a gun on you, you SHOOT, you don't use the piece like brass knuckles. For the love of God, gr2000ow a brain.
-
tomisthegame — 19 years ago(April 23, 2006 11:08 AM)
das-25
What a loser, like seriously. Tellin me to grow a brain lmfao! So your saying he was up against a soldier, and even if the soldier was drunk he would still be unbeatable? Proof might not have been drunk and he could have seen this drunk soldier brandishing a gun and ready to shoot. Proof then just has to sneakily under table pull his gun out and then *bang. One dick dead.
OW! Check Yo Bad Self! -
Peter_Ian_Staker — 19 years ago(April 23, 2006 08:52 PM)
You've been watching a LOT of movies, kid. Real gun fights last an average of 4 seconds, there's no time in the real world for "sneaking" out a gun on a guy who's already "brandishing" (where is that gun, btw?) one and posing a threat and then, for some reason, decide to play patty cake with him first before shooting him. It's probably the least likely scenario out of a million. But you go on believing it if it makes you feel better to recast the tragedy as "proof good, victim bad."
-
goodgirl20042002 — 19 years ago(April 24, 2006 11:06 AM)
none of you was there when it happened. so why are you going back and forth?. the only people that know is keith and proof. We don't know if proof shot first and we don't know if keith shot first. we don't know the truth cuz we was'nt there. all this media coverage and articles are not 100% accurate because all this info has since been disputed or changed around. There are many different stories of what happened and the police are still investigating. anything could have happened that nightwho knows?
-
o9 — 19 years ago(September 09, 2006 08:11 PM)
Reading over some of these posts, more than likely from pre-teens, it's clear they've lost all sense of logic and reasoning, if they ever had any to begin withcan't see the forest for the trees, try and point out facts and they go on some incomprehensible rant about how they know the
true
story and so and so's cousin was there -
sexybags — 19 years ago(January 09, 2007 04:53 PM)
all that has been proven in court is that entherige is guilty of firing a weapon in an occupied building. keith bender and proof's roles in the shootings has yet to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Neither weapon was found, so therefore, ballaistics were'nt done. There is no physical evidence at all that states who shot who. all the evidence painting proof as a murderer is based on unreliable witness testimony, mostly provided by entherige and his lawyer ronald upshaw, and the club owners(notice how all of this is coming from one side).. there were many people at the triple c that night. many of whom that were NOT interviewed by the cops. these witnesses have came forward and contradict the media story, one of whom has since been shot and killed, his name was chop aka gerald gadie. another one gaved an interview to xxl mag. his name is mudd.
there are 2 sides to this story.
in the first scenerio, proof is portrayed as the gun carrying thug who killed a man in cold blood over a pool game. and then comes super mario to the rescue and kills him in self defense.
in the second scenerio, mario is portrayed as the irresponsible bouncer, who handled the situation the wrong way, and as a result, ended up killing them both.
because neither weapon was found, neither story is accurate. and that's why entherige is free.
