Real Father Is…
-
actionmanrandell — 13 years ago(January 05, 2013 09:09 PM)
your an idiot.
there is no such thing as 100% white or 100% black in fact there is no genetic difference between the races.
also if you look at childhood pics of michael and compare them to pics of all 3 of his kids you can tell they are part of the jackson family biologically -
lseeber-1 — 9 years ago(April 16, 2016 04:10 PM)
Whether or not he is the father. There absolutely is a genetic difference between races and any 6th grader should know that. That is how geneticists can tell the race of bodily remains, skeletons, etc. It's also why only certain races are prone to some specific diseases (sickle cell anemia).
-
mptnla — 10 years ago(May 13, 2015 03:55 PM)
Was just on some webpage and it had a link saying Paris Jackson All Grown Up with her 17-year old bf. Its nice that Michael has given the kids a beautiful childhood which is commendable, but you can say with most certainty that he is not the biological father.
Im black and have members of my family who are mixed race. What most people seem to ignore is that skin color is genetic. Michael MAY have bleached his skin, or it could be the effects of the skin disease (doubtful), but genetically he still has DNA for the dark bown skin we saw in the 60s and 70s; therefore, his children would look obviously mixed race, and not so fair.
Further, the Michael most people remember had a lot of plastic surgery, so comparing that Michael to his children and saying they look alike is a little absurd. If anything they should look similar to Michael in his teens to some degree skin color, curly hair, broad noses and all. Nose jobs, chin clefts, chemically straightened hair and bleached skin cannot be transferred through DNA. The older two children look nothing like Michael. I see similarities in the younger child, but maybe Im still picturing MJ when he left us, and not the MJ I grew up with in the 70s.
Twitter - Allowing you to publicly put your foot in your mouth since 2006.