Jared Leto >
-
actionmanrandell — 14 years ago(January 28, 2012 12:51 AM)
her real father is michael jackson
even if5b4 he wasnt the biological father(which he is) he raised those kids from the time they were babies and therefor he is there father.
but aside from that they do not look as white as people say they do. they look like a typical mixed person.
and if you look at child hood photos of michael aswell as his father and grand parents you can see a familur resembelence
there is no dought in my mind that michael is the father of all 3 of his kids
p.s to all of you who say he liked little boys
there is infact no proof of that
he was infact accused by money hungry people. -
Pdogg1985 — 14 years ago(February 16, 2012 03:57 PM)
To me it doesn't matter what anyone says(I know u probly think the same) a Michael Jackson is her real father, a real father is the man that raises a child. And for the mother, what kind of mother comes out only when the dad dies just for the fame, I feel sorry for these kids, yes they are famous and yes they r set for life but to me other than Janet Jackson they lost the only family member that really cared.Just like the grandfather I am sorry but he wants them to be famous just because of the money.I felt so sorry for all three kids watching the funeral cause u can tell they were really close to their dad.
-
DonnaCreate — 13 years ago(July 29, 2012 12:36 AM)
This is the real father of Michael Jackson's oldest children. They are 100% white like everyone except his die hard fans already knew.
http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2009/06/arnold-klein-biological-father-of-michael-jackson-children/ -
actionmanrandell — 13 years ago(January 05, 2013 09:09 PM)
your an idiot.
there is no such thing as 100% white or 100% black in fact there is no genetic difference between the races.
also if you look at childhood pics of michael and compare them to pics of all 3 of his kids you can tell they are part of the jackson family biologically -
lseeber-1 — 9 years ago(April 16, 2016 04:10 PM)
Whether or not he is the father. There absolutely is a genetic difference between races and any 6th grader should know that. That is how geneticists can tell the race of bodily remains, skeletons, etc. It's also why only certain races are prone to some specific diseases (sickle cell anemia).
-
mptnla — 10 years ago(May 13, 2015 03:55 PM)
Was just on some webpage and it had a link saying Paris Jackson All Grown Up with her 17-year old bf. Its nice that Michael has given the kids a beautiful childhood which is commendable, but you can say with most certainty that he is not the biological father.
Im black and have members of my family who are mixed race. What most people seem to ignore is that skin color is genetic. Michael MAY have bleached his skin, or it could be the effects of the skin disease (doubtful), but genetically he still has DNA for the dark bown skin we saw in the 60s and 70s; therefore, his children would look obviously mixed race, and not so fair.
Further, the Michael most people remember had a lot of plastic surgery, so comparing that Michael to his children and saying they look alike is a little absurd. If anything they should look similar to Michael in his teens to some degree skin color, curly hair, broad noses and all. Nose jobs, chin clefts, chemically straightened hair and bleached skin cannot be transferred through DNA. The older two children look nothing like Michael. I see similarities in the younger child, but maybe Im still picturing MJ when he left us, and not the MJ I grew up with in the 70s.
Twitter - Allowing you to publicly put your foot in your mouth since 2006.