Seriuosly, this girl is so bad. How she got an acting job is beyond me. She ruined Emily.
-
BlondeQTAngel007 — 20 years ago(January 03, 2006 10:19 PM)
Obviously your opinion of her doesnt matter. The PROFESSIONALS thought she was the best, and she was. She is an amazingly BEAUTIFUL actress and deserves any award she gets. She is seriously one of the most gorgous women I have ever seen. She could win an emmy on her looks alone.
-
watermelon_swirl — 20 years ago(March 04, 2006 12:06 PM)
i have to agree with part of what eyebrowstj said. tamara bruan was WAY worse then natalia. but she just doesn't seem like emily to me. amber tamblyn will always be emily and natalia just isn't cutting it for me. especially witht his whole sonny/emily thing. gahh i hate it. it grosses me out. i don't think she's a bad actress just not right for emily. but i guess no one in my mind will be good for emily like amber. so if i had the choice of natalia or a recast i think i'll stick with natalia thank you.
-
utmarten — 19 years ago(June 17, 2006 12:32 PM)
Your statement is very harsh. Are you an actor? Do you have any professional training? You sound very petty and jealous to me. A professional casting director (paid to search out and evaluate talent) made the choice to cast Miss Livingston. The fact that she won an Emmy says a great deal about her talent. Given the poorly scripted storylines on "General Hospital," I believe she has done a fantastic job.
-
mooshki — 15 years ago(February 05, 2011 11:37 AM)
THANK YOU!!!! I came to this board to complain about how awful she is, and how pissed I am that she's on Days, and I couldn't believe all the posts from people who think she's so great. Her acting is godawful, even for a soap actress!
