Thought she was lovely on Regis+Kelly.
-
tvlover1961 — 17 years ago(September 04, 2008 05:33 PM)
she had time to organize her method; puree everything in one session, freeze in Zip-loc bags, and pull out what you need as you need it during the week. That's what strikes me as the originality of Jessica's book.
Jessica's ideas of pureeing and placing in zip locs are not originallots of people, including myself, have been doing that for years.
I still think there is something shady about the whole book publishing mess, but I think it will be decided in the judicial system. -
aq_23 — 18 years ago(October 25, 2007 11:23 PM)
I don't think high of this woman at all. Jerry really lowered his standards witht his one. If Jessica wants to do damage control she would donate the profits off of her book. Which clearly she has not done. Oh I don't need the money Well why 5b4don't you donate it, geez!!
-
tvlover1961 — 18 years ago(October 16, 2007 10:21 AM)
Yes, I don't think very highly of her either. If she's donating the proceeds, she should just say so, otherwise, she comes off as a greedy upper class [fill in your own word]. When you've reached that level in society, you really need to pay attention to how you are perceived. She has the right to make her own money, but in the midst of this scandal, or even if there wasn't a scandal, she'd do best to donate whatever she makes off of it and not take one penny. And publicly announce that. What did I read Jerry is worth? $60 million?
I'm sure she has some redeeming qualities, but the whole story of how she & Jerry met and got together really bothers me. I know it happensyou marry someone and realize it's a mistakebut the way it was reported sounded just so soap ope111craish. -
ddblundell — 17 years ago(October 29, 2008 12:54 PM)
Lucky for Jessica there are tons of stupid people out there who will do anything that a celebrity (or someone married to a celebrity) tells them to do.
This means that even if she did steal the book- lots and lots of folks will line up to buy it.