How the Beatles made bad music. (Legitimate argument)
-
ilahilda — 14 years ago(February 10, 2012 07:30 PM)
I'm not a diehard Fab Four fan, but that angers me that someone would trash a talented legendary group like the Fab Four. Yes there are songs that are not great, but that's expected of every artist, even MJ. No one is perfect. Yes they screwed around on their wives, and did drugs, but they never stated they were angels, they only wanted to provide the world with melodic timeless music and they did. 50 years on, it's still popular.
-
planetmutty — 10 years ago(November 30, 2015 10:29 PM)
Interesting all right. Ringo was recruited because he was recognised as the best drummer on the Mersey screen at the time. Sure, there were plenty of better (ok, way better) drummers that came along later but he was still one of the best rock n roll drummers of the early sixties.
Not sure how serious the OP is being but I got a good chuckle out of it.
When I said I wanted to be a comedian, they all laughed at me. Well, they're not laughing now! -
cartesianthought — 10 years ago(March 15, 2016 02:28 PM)
I don't know what to say, except: you're a troll, The Beatles are among the best, the law isn't always right, not all drugs are harmful, Ringo was a great drummer, Pete Best wasn't a great drummer, good vs. evil is a human construct111c, the soul exists only symbolically and the Bible is beep