@MissMargoChanning
-
MissMargoChanning — 2 years ago(October 29, 2023 01:19 PM)
There really is something wrong with her. She has no self awareness. She keeps trying to reinvent herself, and each time, it just makes her look even more foolish. I'm past offended. It's like, Is she for real?
She and Half Wit Harry are jokes. Their self importance and their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
They have hurt so many people with their lies, and they have burned so many bridges. There is no turning back for them.
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night! -
Lilith — 2 years ago(October 29, 2023 03:48 PM)
I'm still wondering about the children. After twice saying her most important "title" is that of "mom," just when the heck do the pair of them ever spend time with these children? They're constantly jetting around the world, on private jets while preaching about the climate, and going on vacations. Alone. When exactly are either of them home to spend time with their precious children to raise them? Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Have you ever watched Lady Colin Cambell?
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
MissMargoChanning — 2 years ago(October 29, 2023 05:00 PM)
I know. These people are far too important and busy to raise their own children!
Unlike some people who believe that these phantom children don't exist, I do believe they are around…. the attic?
I do lean towards the surrogate theory. With all of the lies and the mysterious non-existing birth records, I just don't buy her pregnancies. Both of them are seriousyly mentally ill. I can't see them raising kids. Hopefully, there is a nanny or a birth mother watching out for them.
Yes. I do watch Lady Colin Campbell. She's a hoot. I enjoy her. She knows people who know people. She's well informed.
I am in love with Micky and Aurora. I actually cried when she announced that Treasure had passed away.
Yes… I'm a fan.
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night! -
MissMargoChanning — 2 years ago(October 29, 2023 05:14 PM)
No. It's none of your business. Now move along… whoever you are… as if I couldn't guess…
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night! -
Lilith — 2 years ago(October 29, 2023 05:07 PM)
I definitely think there were surrogates involved. There are way too many videos of Nutmeg wearing what clearly looks like a "moonbump" as it shifts and falls down to her knees! The whole situation around their birth certificates is a mystery, and yet another reason I believe she was never pregnant to begin with. This needs to be made public because if they were not born "of the body" they are not in the line of succession and not entitled to being called Prince and Princess.
It was atrocious how they stole the names Archie and Lilibet like that! They're horrible individuals.
I totally agree! Lady C is such a hoot!
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
soapbox original gangster — 2 years ago(October 31, 2023 01:46 PM)
It was atrocious how they stole the names
Archie and Lilibet
like that! They're horrible individuals.
stole from who? those are two attrocious names so the kids who werent named that should be grateful -
Lilith — 2 years ago(October 31, 2023 04:13 PM)
If you watch the video, which I doubt you'll do but yet you'll still have an opinion on it, albeit uninformed, you would understand.
The name "Archie" was Prince George's "safety name" when they needed to refer to him in public without giving his true identity away. It was a safety measure, -a safety measure that is implemented for
all
members of the royal family so that they can communicate without using their real identity for security purposes. Prince George adored his "nickname" Archie (which again, was used since his birth for security purposes, just as William and Harry had their own "alternate" names). There was no reason that Nutmeg and Harriette had to choose Archie. Harry, especially, knew that was Prince George's coded security name. Their selfishness forced Prince William and Princess Catherine and their team to come up with a new name. This didn't have to happen.
When it came to "Lilibet," they never got the Queen Elizabeth II's permission to use that name, which whether you agree or like it, it is royal protocol to get the Queen's permission on all names. She stated she did not want anyone to use that name, and even if she didn't, it's classless, rude and terribly disrespectful to choose a "nickname" that was private and personal to HMTLQ within her family only, and a personal name Prince Philip would call her in private, (despite how she came across being called Lilibet).
That name is uniquely QEII's and it was just another display of their self-entitled attitude and desire to grift off anything related to the royal family (all while publicly stating they wanted nothing to do with the royal family). They're both horrible people with no boundaries, no respect (for other people or for protocol).
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
mechajutaro — 2 years ago(October 30, 2023 06:22 AM)
I won't defend this skank, but I will rail against this notion that offending someone/even millions of people is, in and of itself, a sin. By this bizarre and preposterous logic, we ought to remove copies of Machiavelli's The Prince, most of Jonathan Swift's writing, and Nabokov's Lolita from our library shelves. After all, they all boast content that many would find offensive
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 
