She must be very comfortable with herself.
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Betsy Rue
iThom — 17 years ago(January 16, 2009 07:52 PM)
Cos she was naked a good five minutes straight, I mean totally naked.
I don't know where she was hiding them, but that girl has some balls!
In here we are all anemic
In here anemic and sweet -
RipRip — 16 years ago(May 25, 2009 09:45 AM)
Humans can't survive with body fat that low, and it would look gross. Body fat isn't a bad thing, when it is at the appropriate levels. The average hollywood actress is TOO THIN. All humans are SUPPOSED to have fat on their bodies, to some degree, and this mindset being promoted that any amount of fat is bad is harmful to all the young girls who end up starving themselves to try to rid themselves of what they are naturally supposed to have. You can have too much fat, but the people in hollywood are not the proper ones to ask how much is too much. Ask a doctor. Also, females are supposed to have more body fat than males. If a female has the same body fat percentage as a healthy male, then she has too little body fat. The American Council on Fitness says 21-24% body fat for a female is FIT. Going lower than 21% increases the risk of certain diseases. Yes, I know you were making a joke, but you were also helping promote an unhealthy body image for women and girls, so I felt the need to respond.
Sometimes evil is just applied stupidity-Ronar -
cldne2000 — 17 years ago(January 20, 2009 12:02 AM)
Well, not really wimp out, but showing poontang is the big taboo of actresses, if they go that far they are often seen as not a serious actress, or cannot ever be seen that way again (or so the logic goes). Thats why if you ever see a big hollywood celeb get nude its usually only breasts/butt but never beaver
There are a few, FEW cases where bigtime celebs showed their muff and still got more popular later like Sharon Stones infamous leg cross in Basic Instinct but usually after they go full nude, like Elizabeth Berkley showing us all her glory in Showgirls, then their careers fade after that. Well she made a bit of a recovery since then but overall she became "seen it all" material and no one really wants to put her in a top level role. Now you can be certain Betsy will only be seen in B movies or small roles in A movies and most likely they will be using her for the girl who is willing to do nude scenes. -
rutgerssucks — 16 years ago(September 25, 2009 12:13 PM)
I don't think Elizabeth Berkley is the best comparison. She wasn't that big of a star before she did that, so it's not like her career faded into oblivion.
Please read and pay attention to what I wrote before posting a reply. -
horatiohornblower — 16 years ago(May 31, 2009 04:03 PM)
I was so impressed that the film-makers chose someone with natural breasts, that I had to come here and say the same about the actress, hehe! Im so SICK of silicone fakethingies, lol, that it was nice to see natural breasts where years ago they would have put balloons on there. And yes, I think Betsy is a beautiful woman!
"Why does the Earth have colors?""The New World"
-
RobBase086-1 — 16 years ago(June 27, 2009 12:04 PM)
She has a great body and I loved seeing her in My Bloody Valentine too!
Dedicated to USA UP ALL NIGHT and the fans of the show!
www.deefilmroll.com/usa-uan/
