Fetishes, cannibalism, and more sexual deviations
-
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(May 30, 2021 09:35 PM)
Then you'll never know and you'll always be judging.
A Hint:
It's not that bad of article.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
Deluded Juice — 4 years ago(May 30, 2021 09:40 PM)
I agree.
He just fantasized about it and never actually did it.
There is never, and I mean never, anything ever wrong with a fantasy no matter what it is as long as it does not turn into reality if it is something illegal or non consensual and will cause harm to others.
Now excuse me while I go and think about this octopus, a pig and a shemale.
Again, these are just thoughts with no harm done! -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(May 30, 2021 09:53 PM)
The strangest thing is that women call foul if you think like a "creep" or say creeping things though there is no proof or foul. She and the law threatens. And this is a major example of it. He just said this in private not like in the news or anything and his entire life is being hanged for it. How is that make any sense? I know lots of people that practice really gross and bizarre sex and worst but they dont look it, dont talk about it, and hide it but society doesnt do anything about them. Just the ones that say it, express, or are caught in some weird media way. It's all bullshit.
Example…
Weinstein, Cosby, and Epstein, not to mention Trump. All have been in cults of deviations of sex circles but nothing has ever happened to them until much much later for some. When they are already old and who gives a **** anymore. And Im not really criticising them. Im criticising society because there had to be someone who drove these girls, saw these girls, contacted these girls… but nobody said anything, nobody gived a **** and they all hid it and denied it. It took forever for many of them to get caught or actually be guilty of anything and its probably because they werent smart enough because some got caught and others are still freeing enjoying deviation.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
Deluded Juice — 4 years ago(May 30, 2021 10:09 PM)
Yeah, it doesn't make sense.
I could email all the tabloids with the craziest, bizarre, made up sex fantasies I could come up with and that will get ignored because I am a nobody.
But if I was a celeb and shared that stuff, front page on every one!
So if they would pay me no mind then why are they minding when it was something that didn't happen and was supposed to be private with a celeb?
What's next? Why not find out what position that movie star was in when she conceived?
We are living in an age where the sex lives of celebs are no longer private and where now they are getting judged for doing weird and wild stuff which should not be the case. -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(May 31, 2021 12:41 AM)
It's because they are rich, famous, and good looking so it sells. They also love to see someone go big and then crash town. Just like Cancel Cultural. It destroys peoples careers even if they are not guilty or say **** that bad. Ive been looking into one of jk howling where she said something insignificant but has been on the news and has hurt her. There was a famous one by Hillary Clinton where she used the term Super Predators and Ive always agreed with it. There is nothing wrong with she said and these monsters are way worst but they have forever slammed her for such crap. It makes me sick to my stomach.
Also if your rich and famous you can also get away with such stuff because if some regular person said it they could lock him or lose his job or whatever. In many instances it keeps these idiots relevant and sells news but nothing hurts them. Even if their careers hits bottom they still have millions to lay back lots of idiots that will forever support them and they can even get great low key work whereas the average joe will get fired, blacksheeped, registered, criminal record, and will go broke.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
Deluded Juice — 4 years ago(May 31, 2021 12:50 AM)
I agree that celeb status does have it's perks and among the legal system is no exception.
Like Linsanity Lohan.
I forgot but I think she did a short stint in jail, didn't she?
If it had been me or you we would still be in a prison cell.
OTOH stars are starting to get busted and do hard time.
OJ, for another crime, Weinstein, Coz and I still cannot believe that Phil Spector died while being in prison instead of as a free man. -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(May 31, 2021 01:06 AM)
Yea, but a very short time and I remember vividly she wrote **** you on her fingers for the judge. If we ever did that we'd be dead.
I remember one time Paris went to Prison and it was a big deal. She were there for literally 15mins and was crying and all over the press and never went to jail again. I go for a million times longer just for a misdemenor, a false accusation, or just for being a suspect.
your talking about the hall of famers though. They did so much crimes and for so long and got so old that they had nowhere else to go. They probably went broke that's why they got locked up. Oj literally killed people and did nothing. I'd want you to do 1% literally 1% of what they did and see how far you go. I swear these people get caught cause there are so stupid and probably tired of doing the same **** that they want to get caught cuz I guarantee you there is a lot worst out there doing a lot worst **** as we speak but we'd never hear about them.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
lukejbarnett — 4 years ago(May 31, 2021 10:42 AM)
look at robert downey jr. the guy was a huge drug addict doing cocaine and sleeping in some strangers bed who ends up getting a career bigger than it was even in the '90s after his drug problems. so yeah they can get away with almost anything. they only time they get in trouble is sex abuse, kevin spacey and weinstein. or by saying a racist comment like roseanne. or an antisemitc comment like mel gibson.
lukejbarnett -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(June 25, 2021 07:33 PM)
Did Mel really get in trouble?
Spacey walked.
I dont think it ever actually hurt Robert's career. He was always in the news and getting parts even if they werent big. I think a big part of the reason he got Stark was because he was so realistically like the character.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
-
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(June 26, 2021 09:27 AM)
lukejbarnett said...
spacey's career is over since he raped that young man waiter you never see him in anything ever since then about 3 years ago, mel has also not been in an big movies since his controversy.
Does it really matter? He is rich as fk, famous as fk, got awards, membership, the whole nine yards. He is also old. When you say career over it just really means retired if he wants to.
Some of Mels movies sold and he still makes them and he still banging whores and spewing about jews. Do you really think he lost anything? Another one that made million trillions on making movies, won awards, is old af.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
lukejbarnett — 4 years ago(June 26, 2021 04:58 PM)
bigbadwolf666 said...
Does it really matter? He is rich as fk, famous as fk, got awards, membership, the whole nine yards. He is also old. When you say career over it just really means retired if he wants to.
Some of Mels movies sold and he still makes them and he still banging whores and spewing about jews. Do you really think he lost anything? Another one that made million trillions on making movies, won awards, is old af.
that's not true at all if he were 35 his career would be over also. bc hollywood cannot ever be ok with someone who makes an anti-semitic remark.
so ever since he did that every single movie he's made has been this pitiful, small, basically b movie movie that has a very small budget and gets limited release and is never a box office hit. he made a stupid independent looking movie with a freaking muppet, really? you know your career is over when you make a movie this stupid.
he was blacklisted for ever making a big movie ever again. you know blacklisting has been around since the 1930s it is a real thing.
lukejbarnett -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(June 26, 2021 08:18 PM)
lukejbarnett said...
that's not true at all if he were 35 his career would be over also. bc hollywood cannot ever be ok with someone who makes an anti-semitic remark.
so ever since he did that every single movie he's made has been this pitiful, small, basically b movie movie that has a very small budget and gets limited release and is never a box office hit. he made a stupid independent looking movie with a freaking muppet, really? you know your career is over when you make a movie this stupid.
he was blacklisted for ever making a big movie ever again. you know blacklisting has been around since the 1930s it is a real thing.
If you really think Mel Gibson cant do whatever he wants you're delusional. The man is super rich af and super famous af and actually quite good too. He makes whatever movies he wants. If you really think he needs to make one more movie you're living in a drug world. There is nothing left for him to accomplish and he has so much money that he can make his own movies without any approval. If he makes movies whether they suck or not that's cause he wants to. I remember him being in the expendables so I dont think he's career was over. He also made one not too long ago about a daughter and him having this awful looking beard but the movie wasnt that bad. I remember vividly that Edge Of Darkness was supposed to be his last film and had it been it would've been great and I thought it was a great film but he lied and it wasnt and based on that I stopped being a fan. Just like Clint with Gran Torino. He had said it was going to be his last acting film but it wasnt so I said **** that. Now are you going to say Clint has to continue to make films? I dont think you're aware how truly rich these guys are. Mel can just spend the rest of his life without working a single second and he'd still live lavishly and Im sure if he was anti-Semite he'd still have fans. Not that I really give a **** about him.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
lukejbarnett — 4 years ago(June 27, 2021 02:58 AM)
bigbadwolf666 said...
If you really think Mel Gibson cant do whatever he wants you're delusional. The man is super rich af and super famous af and actually quite good too. He makes whatever movies he wants. If you really think he needs to make one more movie you're living in a drug world. There is nothing left for him to accomplish and he has so much money that he can make his own movies without any approval. If he makes movies whether they suck or not that's cause he wants to. I remember him being in the expendables so I dont think he's career was over. He also made one not too long ago about a daughter and him having this awful looking beard but the movie wasnt that bad. I remember vividly that Edge Of Darkness was supposed to be his last film and had it been it would've been great and I thought it was a great film but he lied and it wasnt and based on that I stopped being a fan. Just like Clint with Gran Torino. He had said it was going to be his last acting film but it wasnt so I said fuck that. Now are you going to say Clint has to continue to make films? I dont think you're aware how truly rich these guys are. Mel can just spend the rest of his life without working a single second and he'd still live lavishly and Im sure if he was anti-Semite he'd still have fans. Not that I really give a fuck about him.
expand
he can't do anything he wants and that doesn't make me delusional no one is immune to criticism and crucifiction by hollywood and the entertainment industry. hollywood is so ****ing fickle that they can and often do get rid of huge celebrities seemingly for no reason, ever wonder why al pacino can't get a big movie to save his live anymore and hasn't been an big movie in 10 years?
well actually i think i know why he lost his career and it's from being in gigli, one of the worst movies ever made. an actor can ruin their career by doing a whole host of different things. they can be racist, a gay basher, they can get too old to be in big movies or too fat to be in big movies.
and if al pacino even a hollywood legend of the biggest kind can lose his career in big movies by just being in a really bad movie and bad small movies maybe then of course mel gibson can lose his career by offending millions of people in america by being tone deaf and insensitive of jewish people which is very controversial especially in today's liberal hollywood.
that's such a cop out saying he doesn't need to make any more movies bc if that's true then why is she still trying to make more movies all the time ever since he got in trouble?
ok if you are right then let's see if he ever makes one, one more big movie that makes a lot of money at the box office and is critically acclaimed and is respected by all the critics and everyone love mel gibson again.
im betting on none of this ever happening, none of these things.
you have to live in reality and the reality is hollywood hates him now and will never like him or accept him ever again.
the reality is ever since he got in trouble he's made edge of darkness basically a b movie that somehow made it to theaters and a movie about a stupid pet beaver which is just a stuffed animal.
oooh the expendables a small bit part so small that he's not on the cover of the movie any cover and so it's a cameo, no one remembers or cares about this role give me a freakin' break.
so that doesn't count bc it's too small a part and he only got it as a favor from stallone or someone else involved in the movie ad only be they felt sorry for him losing his career if it was made after his controversy.
lukejbarnett -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(June 27, 2021 08:55 PM)
lukejbarnett said...
he can't do anything he wants and that doesn't make me delusional no one is immune to criticism and crucifiction by hollywood and the entertainment industry. hollywood is so fucking fickle that they can and often do get rid of huge celebrities seemingly for no reason, ever wonder why al pacino can't get a big movie to save his live anymore and hasn't been an big movie in 10 years?
well actually i think i know why he lost his career and it's from being in gigli, one of the worst movies ever made. an actor can ruin their career by doing a whole host of different things. they can be racist, a gay basher, they can get too old to be in big movies or too fat to be in big movies.
and if al pacino even a hollywood legend of the biggest kind can lose his career in big movies by just being in a really bad movie and bad small movies maybe then of course mel gibson can lose his career by offending millions of people in america by being tone deaf and insensitive of jewish people which is very controversial especially in today's liberal hollywood.
that's such a cop out saying he doesn't need to make any more movies bc if that's true then why is she still trying to make more movies all the time ever since he got in trouble?
ok if you are right then let's see if he ever makes one, one more big movie that makes a lot of money at the box office and is critically acclaimed and is respected by all the critics and everyone love mel gibson again.
im betting on none of this ever happening, none of these things.
you have to live in reality and the reality is hollywood hates him now and will never like him or accept him ever again.
the reality is ever since he got in trouble he's made edge of darkness basically a b movie that somehow made it to theaters and a movie about a stupid pet beaver which is just a stuffed animal.
oooh the expendables a small bit part so small that he's not on the cover of the movie any cover and so it's a cameo, no one remembers or cares about this role give me a freakin' break.
so that doesn't count bc it's too small a part and he only got it as a favor from stallone or someone else involved in the movie ad only be they felt sorry for him losing his career if it was made after his controversy.
expand
That's not true. I'm sure if you look at the long history of hollywood and the music industry you'll find plenty that got by untouched. He is still making movies and headlining. Way to be hurt. So many will never even get a role though they have spent their entire lives.
I think you just shot your foot. You said Al. For starters what did Al do to get blacklisted?
Is funny you mentioned that cause I've seen quite a few of really good movies Al has made the last couple of years that no one talks about, knows about, and mentions but they are quite good and I'm very glad his made them cause they are good movies that his giving a chance instead of selling out. I think the reason why some dont try to cast him is cause he's so old that they dont think he'll have the appeal, he wont attract the young girls or crowd anymore they might think, he might not got it anymore but that's not true. The man is a legend and probably the great actor who's ever lived.
Didnt he just make the Irish man like two years ago where he got so much recognition and praise?
I havent seen that one but was starting to watch it and saw the beginning and liked it. How good it was made and instead of sucking and it being a milking.
Gigli mightve been panned and bombed but I dont think it was that bad. I never saw it but saw bits of it and could see what they were trying to do. Surely they are way worst and Im not quite sure if you know Al. He has made so many movies and in such varieties, from playing cartoons to devils, to cartoon like, to angels. He's done it all. I think he is quite impressive.
Mel makes movies because like I said, because he wants to. If he really was blacklisted he wouldnt be nowhere near a tv like Kevin you say. He is also so rich he can make his own movies if he wants to. If you really think Mel needs to work in movies for money your delusional. The man is beyond rich. He works cause he likes acting. He could just phone it in by directing or producing and might even make even more.
Edge of Darkness was not a B-Movie. It was a pretty good movie, I liked, that did get respect and recognition. The reason he didnt end it there was because like I said he likes acting. So much that he is obsessed with it.
Whether the role in expendable was big or not is no matter. They put him in there cause he is Mel and Mel is big. If he was so blacklisted why did they even consider to take a chance of him in that? No real blacklister would ever start in such a big franchise. Try to put Roman Polanski to direct expendable see what happens.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
lukejbarnett — 4 years ago(June 29, 2021 04:23 PM)
bigbadwolf666 said...
That's not true. I'm sure if you look at the long history of hollywood and the music industry you'll find plenty that got by untouched. He is still making movies and headlining. Way to be hurt. So many will never even get a role though they have spent their entire lives.
I think you just shot your foot. You said Al. For starters what did Al do to get blacklisted?
Is funny you mentioned that cause I've seen quite a few of really good movies Al has made the last couple of years that no one talks about, knows about, and mentions but they are quite good and I'm very glad his made them cause they are good movies that his giving a chance instead of selling out. I think the reason why some dont try to cast him is cause he's so old that they dont think he'll have the appeal, he wont attract the young girls or crowd anymore they might think, he might not got it anymore but that's not true. The man is a legend and probably the great actor who's ever lived.
Didnt he just make the Irish man like two years ago where he got so much recognition and praise?
I havent seen that one but was starting to watch it and saw the beginning and liked it. How good it was made and instead of sucking and it being a milking.
Gigli mightve been panned and bombed but I dont think it was that bad. I never saw it but saw bits of it and could see what they were trying to do. Surely they are way worst and Im not quite sure if you know Al. He has made so many movies and in such varieties, from playing cartoons to devils, to cartoon like, to angels. He's done it all. I think he is quite impressive.
Mel makes movies because like I said, because he wants to. If he really was blacklisted he wouldnt be nowhere near a tv like Kevin you say. He is also so rich he can make his own movies if he wants to. If you really think Mel needs to work in movies for money your delusional. The man is beyond rich. He works cause he likes acting. He could just phone it in by directing or producing and might even make even more.
Edge of Darkness was not a B-Movie. It was a pretty good movie, I liked, that did get respect and recognition. The reason he didnt end it there was because like I said he likes acting. So much that he is obsessed with it.
Whether the role in expendable was big or not is no matter. They put him in there cause he is Mel and Mel is big. If he was so blacklisted why did they even consider to take a chance of him in that? No real blacklister would ever start in such a big franchise. Try to put Roman Polanski to direct expendable see what happens.
expand
i wasn't talking about al being blacklisted i was mentioning him in reference to the fact of actors losing their careers for no reason, so by not doing anything bad just getting old or for no reason bc hollywood is fickle.
we have evidence of mel bc ever since his controversy he hasn't made a big movie, so you an live in fantasy land all you want but his career was fine up until he had that controversy and then suddenly his career was over. don't you think there had to be a reason why his career ended right after the controversy? it's cause and effect.
i already said they did it as a favor to mel from his connection with stallone.
his role was small in the expendables movie bc they couldn't take a chance on him bc of the controversy.
i thought you said you lost respect for eastwood when he lied about his last acting role being in gran torino? so why didn't you also lose respect for mel after he lied about edge of darkness being his last acting role?
lukejbarnett