Stop the CGI
-
flower-power-11 — 12 years ago(December 12, 2013 11:53 AM)
Movies aren't supposed to be about art. They're an entertainment form, like music or books. I'll grant that there are a lot of movies out there with gorgeous cinematography, like The Lord of the Rings movies, but that doesn't mean that I don't accept cgi too. A few cgi movies are funny and worth my watch.
-
space_station — 12 years ago(February 11, 2014 02:42 PM)
Every 4 yrs. computers become twice as fast & twice as powerful. Yay for CGI. I'd rather see CGI than another guy in a rubber suit with a mask. And yes, movies are constantly & continually about the
ART
of it all from, set design, to costumes, to lighting, special effects, to casting,to music, to choosing what lenses are to be used & everything. Movie making is an art-from beginning to end.
And yes, there very definitely an art to good CGI effects
~
~ -
ComicNerd — 11 years ago(October 18, 2014 02:56 PM)
CGI is a great tool however it has to be used in a way that connects with the audience. I think the biggest downfall of CGI is when a movie shoots the movie in a way that is physically impossible with a real camera.
-
c_hopley-208-276306 — 11 years ago(January 10, 2015 06:59 AM)
I agree with Tommy to an extent.
Computer graphics/animation have come very far in technological advancement. It seems apparent that this is some sort of excuse to make redundant the use of other elements such as robotics, costume or puppetry. Whilst you could say that they still exist, some directors are excessively replacing these areas with the use of CG. Peter Jackson is a perfect example.
The abuse of computer graphics causes a scene to loose its sense of realism. This affects the audiences relationship with the created world.
I do believe that there are areas of production, which benefit greatly from CG when implemented properly using the right balance of lighting and color correction in post. There are areas in films, which CG is obviously the better alternative, however, to see certain elements of a film painted in CG when a more realistic replacement (e.g. Costume) could have served better, annoys me.
I do think that both Hollywood and directors should take a step back from its use of CG and blend it evenly with realistic alternatives to create the best result. -
politicidal — 10 years ago(March 11, 2016 03:59 PM)
CGI is just a tool. There's nothing wrong with it in of itself. I can't stand this "NO CGI" whining nonsense. If people don't like it being overused or are going to complain about a movie using it at all, I honestly don't know how to change your mind nor have the patience to.
What's missing in movies is same as in society: a good sense of work ethic and living up to ideals. -
AnthonyRocks — 4 years ago(December 29, 2021 07:49 PM)
If it is done well then I do like CGI in Movies although I do like it more when Movies do Practical Effects.
Honestly, When it comes to the Subject of Practical Effects in Movies…..The Best Practical Effects that I have ever seen in a Movie are the Practical Effects that were done in the 1982 Movie "
John Carpenter's THE THING
".