Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. 13 hours and no messages at the time of writing.

13 hours and no messages at the time of writing.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
17 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    j_w_pepper — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 06:23 AM)

    I'm not saying that I thought any of those mentioned were bad movies (didn't see HAPPY FEET and the latest BOURNE, but saw the others albeit not in a theatre but from disk). I was also pleasantly surprised by JOHN CARTER and most Marvel movies I saw (though I'm tired of those repetitive CGI orgies in the meantime). Just saying that none of those have any meaning for the future of the Bond series. Bond fans are not run-of-the-mill action fans and won't desert just because some Spandex models offer more bang for the buck.
    Ceterum censeo OCTOPUSSY esse delendam.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      HugeDaiCottermee — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 06:51 AM)

      Verily I say unto thee..granted but the problem with the Bond films at present is too little bang (in the action scenes) and too much buck (spent on inappropriate and/or expensive directors).

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        philwhite-411-828978 — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 07:18 AM)

        Come on Bap.
        I actually agree with a fair amount of things you say on this board, but Marvel film's success have absolutely nothing to do with Bond.
        Wether I agree with the current direction of the Bond films or not, I can guarantee that Bond 25 will outgross Dr. Strange.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          TheSharkFromJaws — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 08:56 AM)

          I was thoroughly underwhelmed with Captain America Civil War and have not been truly impressed with anything MCU related since the first Avengers film, the one exception maybe being Guardians of the Galaxy. The MCU has been running the same playbook on autopilot for years now, which I'm sure is why the faithful are enjoying it so much, so more power to them.
          That said, like, do you even realize how much you claim things like this only for Skyfall and Spectre to have massive success?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            HugeDaiCottermee — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 04:37 AM)

            Verily I say unto theecongratulations (??) on being perhaps the only person on Earth underwhelmed by the magnificent CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR. Maybe if it had had a rubber shark in it you would have been more impressed.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              philwhite-411-828978 — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 04:56 AM)

              I have to say, Civil War didnt do much for me either. I think I am burnt out on the Marvel films.
              The airport fight was excellent though.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                dinkywinky123 — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 05:03 AM)

                Not surprising because Marvel hits it out of the ball park every time whereas the Bond producers seem to not even know where the ball park is located anymore and one now has to question the future of the 007 franchise.
                Disney is a huge corporation releasing Marvel films at 'conveyor belt' regularity. Eon/Danjaq is a small business assisted by a studio, MGM, which goes bankrupt on a regular basis!
                If Disney bought 100 percent of the Bond franchise I'd imagine we'd get spin-off Bond films like young Bond age 16, Bond set in the 1960s, Bond vs Star Wars, Pixar Bond, and the Kevin McClory tribute film: Thunderball part three!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  TheSharkFromJaws — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 05:07 AM)

                  Rubber sharks make everything better.
                  And yes, Civil War was just more of the same. I don't see what everyone else is flipping out about. Winter Soldier underwhelmed me too.
                  I liked Ant-Man and the aforementioned Guardians of the Galaxy though.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    HugeDaiCottermee — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 05:10 AM)

                    Verily I say unto theeI could never be underwhelmed by movies with that much fighting in them. I'm a punch happy guy and delight in being so.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      pking-2 — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 12:22 PM)

                      Hmmm. So you're telling me (not to mention others) that I did not post here for a short while because of
                      Doctor Strange
                      ?
                      How did you deduce as much? I'm curious.
                      Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm rea
                      d
                      er.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups