The apparent statement of former 14 year old taking Walz to court.
-
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 14, 2024 11:19 PM)
Oh,
it gets better
/.
A whole chain of events which isn't very well baked together have been put forward, all third-hand.
If it's not this DocNetyoutube account that's trolling, it's whoever is feeding him.
Outside of
Tim Walz, his wife Gwen and 'Byron Green' all resigning together from Alliance High School in Nebraska on the 1st July 1996, shortly after Tim resigning from his responsibilities in the position of Coaching Assistant due to his pleading guilty to a reckless driving (Reduced from DUI) charge on March 16th 1996, his attending some concerts in the capacity of a Gay-Straight Alliance mentorship program for students (
Which is on record in an interview he and his wife did of August this year
) and these 'claims' on /Twitter that a third party is making through a proxy
there is nothing on him
.
I'd say a fabrication in its entirety
Don't get me wrong Tim's a politician and so, by default, not to be trusted. But this is a very serious claim and if completely made up to try and discredit him will always hang around like a bad smell unless it's extinguished.
Unless some man of 38 years goes to a court and starts legal actions I'd say that this is an awful attempt to smear someone for political clout.
Call me ∑ -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 15, 2024 01:10 AM)
He's either done what is being said (Not likely) and an illiterate person who can only post things already provable by the time they make them*.
Or an ugly person is out to get him because of his current political career (Very likely).
*If we get a raised chest scar, an arm scar and a Chinese tattoo in his upper inner thigh then bingo! There's a chance. If he has to prove that he doesn't have them, bingo! The trolls caught their target.
Call me ∑ -
/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(October 15, 2024 12:17 PM)
It's clearly the second one. These kind of stories don't break on some random person's Twitter account. If there was truth to it the accuser would be meeting with legit media outlets and the Trump campaign would be all over it.
My password is password. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 15, 2024 12:41 PM)
You and I both know this but the amount of hype that it's generated has been wading into highly questionable intelligence from certain key players in the Trump hierarchy
Amazing though how proper news establishments are when it comes to defecating Democrats though.
Actual evidence on Hunter Biden - nothing.
Zero evidence on Tim Walz - nothing.
Actual evidence on Hillary Clinton - Nothing.
Zero evidence on Donald Trump - Throw the whale at it!
Highly suspect.
Still, it looks like poor Tim might be getting the Vance couch treatment for the rest of his days
Call me ∑ -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 15, 2024 01:50 PM)
On both occasions there was verifiable evidence and it should have gone into a punitive process via the law.
Calling Fox "News" media, aside, they were both untouched and continue to be.
On this occasion with Tim Walz they are taking the correct approach. This is the only occasion which they've got right (Which has me worried).
Call me ∑ -
/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(October 15, 2024 04:33 PM)
Fox News gets much bigger ratings than other news networks. They control political media. Both Hillary and Hunter were investigated by law enforcement. All Hunter ended up getting hit with was a charge for not admitting to using drugs when he bought a gun and not paying enough taxes. The investigation of Hillary found nothing and she was cleared of any wrongdoing. That includes investigations conducted by republicans themselves. Both stories turned out to be nothing more than right-wing media nonsense.
My password is password. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 15, 2024 04:39 PM)
No, a laptop existed which had plenty of illegal 'things' on it.
Emails were sent and received from a private server conveying government matters.
These two things happened, there is evidence of it happening and both are just the tips of speculative conspiracy theories.
I'm all for the wonders of imagination that goes into the conspiracy theories, there are some whoppers out there. But the laptop existed, as did the private server - there is evidence of both.
If we only stick too the facts then both Hunter and Hillary should be facing serious legal charges
If you wish to get imaginative beyond that, then feel free. But laws were broken by people who were in key positions related to national security.
Call me ∑ -
/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 12:40 AM)
The police investigated Hunter Biden's laptop and they found nothing illegal. The email case was overblown nonsense involving arcane government regulations. There was zero harm done and it was investigated numerous times and it was found there was no criminal wrongdoing.
My password is password. -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:11 AM)
It was a fake controversy from the very beginning. Republicans were desperately fishing for anything they could use against Clinton for years. And in typical fashion they settled on an extremely stupid argument, as is tradition. She wasn't the the first to use a private email server. Trump's people weren't the last. There's a 100% chance that people in Biden's are doing the same thing, and Trump II or Harris will have people doing it too.
Any large organization is going to have widely ignored rules that haven't been updated in years or decades and don't make sense anymore. New hires at my job have to sign forms that still have references to our pager policy in them. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:34 AM)
Any large organization…
Government isn't any large organisation. It's the government.
If what you say is true then how can a failing system which doesn't obey its own mandates to others possibly be an authority on anything, let alone someone's liberties and punishments?
How can the tax collectors, which allow for this entire government machine to continue operating, find out that you are a penny short on your returns and yet have foreign nonelected bodies control what happens to every single penny you have declared be off the books?
What's stopping anyone from just deciding that they are the king or queen and taking everything they want?
Now that we have our little lesson on why government agencies are held to a higher account than 'any large organisation' done and dusted - why aren't every single one of those people you mentioned using private servers for public documents being investigated by those who would kill someone for perceived crimes having gone through the full judicial system?
Why haven't they already killed you and I for simply asking these questions?
Laws exist for a reason and they aren't just thrown together on a whim.
That is what the US is based on, otherwise it would still just be a lovely extra tax return for the British.
Call me ∑ -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:32 AM)
∂³∑x² said...
Any large organization…
Government isn't any large organisation. It's the government.
If what you say is true then how can a failing system which doesn't obey its own mandates to others possibly be an authority on anything, let alone someone's liberties and punishments?
How can the tax collectors, which allow for this entire government machine to continue operating, find out that you are a penny short on your returns and yet have foreign nonelected bodies control what happens to every single penny you have declared be off the books?
What's stopping anyone from just deciding that they are the king or queen and taking everything they want?
Now that we have our little lesson on why government agencies are held to a higher account than 'any large organisation' done and dusted - why aren't every single one of those people you mentioned using private servers for public documents being investigated by those who would kill someone for perceived crimes having gone through the full judicial system?
Why haven't they already killed you and I for simply asking these questions?
Laws exist for a reason and they aren't just thrown together on a whim.
That is what the US is based on, otherwise it would still just be a lovely extra tax return for the British.
expand
That's one hell of a leap going from some rules being outdated straight into the entire system is failing and everything is a free for all. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:36 AM)
Uncreative said...
That's one hell of a leap going from some rules being outdated straight into the entire system is failing and everything is a free for all.
That's one helluva leap into saying that national security isn't important
Call me ∑ -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:44 AM)
∂³∑x² said...
That's one helluva leap into saying that national security isn't important
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing. If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:59 AM)
Uncreative said...
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing. If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much.
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing
Sorry, I haven't read the rest yet but I just wanted you to know my immediate reaction to that statement and allow me to do something I very rarely do and call someone (You!) a retard
Now back on with the jollies…
If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much.
Her hotel bathroom janitor was asking anyone coming in to do a piss how best to plug her encrypted email server into a potato
.
Now, how do you know that there wasn't any damage done to national security? What mechanisms of information transportation and feedback reliance do you have access to which puts your information beyond reproach?
Call me ∑ -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:06 PM)
∂³∑x² said...
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing
Sorry, I haven't read the rest yet but I just wanted you to know my immediate reaction to that statement and allow me to do something I very rarely do and call someone (You!) a retard
Now back on with the jollies…
If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much.
Her hotel bathroom janitor was asking anyone coming in to do a piss how best to plug her encrypted email server into a potato
.
Now, how do you know that there wasn't any damage done to national security? What mechanisms of information transportation and feedback reliance do you have access to which puts your information beyond reproach?
expand
A random anonymous reddit post is supposedly to prove your point? Now that's peak retard right there.
