Is it all bullshit and people are putting a man's career, possibly life, in danger?
-
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:11 AM)
It was a fake controversy from the very beginning. Republicans were desperately fishing for anything they could use against Clinton for years. And in typical fashion they settled on an extremely stupid argument, as is tradition. She wasn't the the first to use a private email server. Trump's people weren't the last. There's a 100% chance that people in Biden's are doing the same thing, and Trump II or Harris will have people doing it too.
Any large organization is going to have widely ignored rules that haven't been updated in years or decades and don't make sense anymore. New hires at my job have to sign forms that still have references to our pager policy in them. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:34 AM)
Any large organization…
Government isn't any large organisation. It's the government.
If what you say is true then how can a failing system which doesn't obey its own mandates to others possibly be an authority on anything, let alone someone's liberties and punishments?
How can the tax collectors, which allow for this entire government machine to continue operating, find out that you are a penny short on your returns and yet have foreign nonelected bodies control what happens to every single penny you have declared be off the books?
What's stopping anyone from just deciding that they are the king or queen and taking everything they want?
Now that we have our little lesson on why government agencies are held to a higher account than 'any large organisation' done and dusted - why aren't every single one of those people you mentioned using private servers for public documents being investigated by those who would kill someone for perceived crimes having gone through the full judicial system?
Why haven't they already killed you and I for simply asking these questions?
Laws exist for a reason and they aren't just thrown together on a whim.
That is what the US is based on, otherwise it would still just be a lovely extra tax return for the British.
Call me ∑ -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:32 AM)
∂³∑x² said...
Any large organization…
Government isn't any large organisation. It's the government.
If what you say is true then how can a failing system which doesn't obey its own mandates to others possibly be an authority on anything, let alone someone's liberties and punishments?
How can the tax collectors, which allow for this entire government machine to continue operating, find out that you are a penny short on your returns and yet have foreign nonelected bodies control what happens to every single penny you have declared be off the books?
What's stopping anyone from just deciding that they are the king or queen and taking everything they want?
Now that we have our little lesson on why government agencies are held to a higher account than 'any large organisation' done and dusted - why aren't every single one of those people you mentioned using private servers for public documents being investigated by those who would kill someone for perceived crimes having gone through the full judicial system?
Why haven't they already killed you and I for simply asking these questions?
Laws exist for a reason and they aren't just thrown together on a whim.
That is what the US is based on, otherwise it would still just be a lovely extra tax return for the British.
expand
That's one hell of a leap going from some rules being outdated straight into the entire system is failing and everything is a free for all. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:36 AM)
Uncreative said...
That's one hell of a leap going from some rules being outdated straight into the entire system is failing and everything is a free for all.
That's one helluva leap into saying that national security isn't important
Call me ∑ -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:44 AM)
∂³∑x² said...
That's one helluva leap into saying that national security isn't important
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing. If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:59 AM)
Uncreative said...
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing. If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much.
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing
Sorry, I haven't read the rest yet but I just wanted you to know my immediate reaction to that statement and allow me to do something I very rarely do and call someone (You!) a retard
Now back on with the jollies…
If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much.
Her hotel bathroom janitor was asking anyone coming in to do a piss how best to plug her encrypted email server into a potato
.
Now, how do you know that there wasn't any damage done to national security? What mechanisms of information transportation and feedback reliance do you have access to which puts your information beyond reproach?
Call me ∑ -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:06 PM)
∂³∑x² said...
There wasn't any damage to national security from the whole thing
Sorry, I haven't read the rest yet but I just wanted you to know my immediate reaction to that statement and allow me to do something I very rarely do and call someone (You!) a retard
Now back on with the jollies…
If she was storing piles of classified documents in an unsecured hotel bathroom that might raise a few questions but an encrypted email server, not so much.
Her hotel bathroom janitor was asking anyone coming in to do a piss how best to plug her encrypted email server into a potato
.
Now, how do you know that there wasn't any damage done to national security? What mechanisms of information transportation and feedback reliance do you have access to which puts your information beyond reproach?
expand
A random anonymous reddit post is supposedly to prove your point? Now that's peak retard right there. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:18 PM)
Uncreative said...
A random anonymous reddit post is supposedly to prove your point? Now that's peak retard right there.
Oh,
there more to it than that
as well you could know if you weren't either a genuine retard or purposefully omitting information that's public
And if you are withholding information, you're still a retard
Call me ∑ -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 02:47 PM)
∂³∑x² said...
Oh,
there more to it than that
as well you could know if you weren't either a genuine retard or purposefully omitting information that's public
And if you are withholding information, you're still a retard
Wow you upgraded to a Twitter post about a reddit post. Shit is really getting serious now. -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 03:00 PM)
Uncreative said...
Wow you upgraded to a Twitter post about a reddit post. Shit is really getting serious now.
I can keep upgrading all the way to the congressional hearing where he gets impunity for keeping quiet if you want
I reiterate; it's either or both for you
Call me ∑ -
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(October 17, 2024 02:04 PM)
You know how these crazies go though /., now it was a false flag by way of distraction from the real truth about what happened and damn these illuminati overlords for their misdirection and eating babies in plan sight!
I will say though that the Alec Jones amount (Something like a trillion dollars) is a bit over heavy handed, because he can't pay it and so it means that the families affected don't get the promised compensation at the fault of the ruling.
But that's nothing to do with Alec's slandering of murdered children, just a silly court ruling.
I know there's no way to control everyone who claims to be in support of any particular thing, but dropping scepticism for the chance to succeed is stupid, plain and simple.
Call me ∑