hero
-
phantomparticle — 3 years ago(November 25, 2022 03:15 AM)
Walter Brennan had the best reply to this question.
He preferred second billing as a character actor. If the movie bombs, no one will say Brennan's movie bombed. They will say, "Cooper's movie bombed."
Villain would be my first choice, but I'd be content as a side character just to be in the film.
And This, Too, Shall Pass Away -
𝕤 𝕚 𝕩𝕩𝕩 𝕤 𝕜 𝕚 𝕟 𝕤 — 3 years ago(November 25, 2022 03:24 AM)
a villain would be so much more fun to play and also probably easier. it’s easy to act crazy af
i’d probs wanna be an interesting side character with sage advice that either helps the protagonist grow along their arc or tries to evoke some sort of emotion out of the antagonist and then gets set on fire and thrown off a building into a horde of leprous cannibals -
-
Vlad. — 3 years ago(November 25, 2022 10:23 AM)
except Satan was originally an agent of god, was he not? I’ve read the story changed many times with different translations and iterations of Christianity.
I grew up thinking the story was, Lucifer genuinely rebelled and was beaten and “became” Satan, sorta like anakin an ddarth Vader. Pretty sure in some iterations, this progression becomes muddled and Satan is arguably a different entity or the same entity, but in service to god. The tempting angel. You see this is the story of Job, which if I recall is the guy who Satan and god place a bet on to see if he will renounce god after his son Is sacrificed.
Really it would make sense for god to comprise both good and evil. It’s all in the text; man is created in the likeness of god, ergo both god and man are capable of true evil and true “good.” Satan, meanwhile, is traditionally purely evil, with his rebellious nature framed as fighting against oppression of the
LORD
; in reality, Satan is a narcissistic and greedy, malevolent entity, whose intent is to force mankind toward self destruction. There is no noble, beneficial motivation at play; Abrahamic god is the better of the two.
Stop.
