Under The Skin (2013)
-
frtt wins3, pHd — 2 years ago(May 02, 2023 04:13 PM)
i don't care who liked it or didn't. i am capable of making a decision for myself based on what i saw and what i saw did not rank as a great film. as i said showing tits does not a great film make. it tried too hard and failed as far as i'm concerned. u like it? good for u. i saw this film twice and came to the same conclusion both times. i understand it. it's just a bad film.
-
Rocketman — 2 years ago(May 02, 2023 04:25 PM)
i don't care who liked it or didn't.
But, considering literally everyone else who has posted in this thread about not liking (or caring much for) it is a ****ing moron, it doesn't really lend your argument about the movie not being any good much credence.
it's just a bad film.
It really isn't. You just didn't like it. And that's fine, btw. The movie is very divisive. However, that doesn't make it a bad movie.
If one were to actually break it down piece by piece, then one would realize it's a well-made movie. But, if you only look at it on a superficial level, you'll think it sucks because it doesn't answer any questions, relies a lot on imagery and symbolism, and doesn't have any action.
Throughout Heaven and Earth, I alone am the honored one. -
frtt wins3, pHd — 2 years ago(May 02, 2023 04:33 PM)
my opinion has nothing to do to those who don't like it on this thread. for u to think so makes u a real dope. whether or not they lend credence is not of any value here.
i don't care who liked it or who didn't. i make up my own mind.
and it was a terrible film. i luv films with imagery. i luv johansson. this was just a terrible film. and it did have action. where the hell were u? i guess too involved in staring at her tits.
