This message has been deleted.
-
尺ロㄈにモイ-ら凡几 — 6 years ago(January 27, 2020 06:44 AM)
AnnaMariasaid...
It really isn't. The cinematography is lovely and that is about it. Once people stop fan boying over it and really look at the story impartially they will realize other war movies have done it better. Much much better. See I can play that game too if you really want to argue. I usually don't because taste is subjective. Since you are a special case I made an exception
Fortunately for me the night was not all lost. I watched Ford v Ferrari again. A far far better movie. Christian Bale was robbed of an Oscar nod. He is more deserving then the Joker idiot.
The story isn't supposed to be anything extraordinary, just two soldiers going from point A to point B trying to prevent an entire company of soldiers from being massacred.
Taste may be subjective, but the qualities of a movie aren't. This movie isn't a movie focusing on story or focusing on characters, it's a technical achievement that is a brutal and realistic depiction of WWI. It's like Dunkirk in that way. Just a movie meant to showcase the horrors of war. And in that regard, it did a phenomenal job.
I live. I die. I live again. -
MovieManCin2 — 6 years ago(January 27, 2020 01:58 AM)
I think it will come down to either
Joker
or
1917
. It's a one word title Oscar year.
My choice is
1917,
with best actor going to that
rude whack job
Joaquin Phoenix for
Joker.
MAGA! FAFO!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 
-
Platonic_Caveman — 6 years ago(January 27, 2020 02:56 AM)
Nimda is MY wife, fool. But yes I admire Gavrilo Princip. He was a hero of Orthodox Civilization. He was an anti-royalist. What's not to like? I'm pro-Serbian, anti-Bosnian. I would have so ****ed that boy. Bill Clinton should have been tried for war crimes.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy