Well.
-
vikade1 — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 05:48 AM)
The statement I posted is not their only bit of reasoning. They actually didn't even come to the religious angle.
They simply took offense with the governments contention that executive orders are not under the review of the court, and the fact that the government failed to show any reasons for the urgency of the executive order.
Ha. It also said the White House can't be taken at it's word because it keeps changing it. That's something. -
vikade1 — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 06:01 AM)
It didn't. That's what the court said. You know better than them? And it was a unanimous decision at that.
His attorney general said it won't pass and he fired her.
Trump has to reword the executive order if he wants it to go through. But doing that would mean admitting he was wrong. -
DrSpeceman — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 06:05 AM)
The AG was an Obama remnant. She tried to play politics and Trump dumped the bitch.
These San Francisco judges also tried to be political. They're going to end up looking like a bunch of liberal clowns in a couple of weeks.
There is absolutely no need to reword the order.