Wings vs The Artist
-
nielw — 12 years ago(February 23, 2014 07:21 PM)
While I liked The Artist, the black and white silent film angle was a gimmick that gave it plenty of attention during awards season. I actually like the story in Wings better.
So really it's not a fair comparison, since the Artist isn't actually a silent film from the silent film era. It just pays homage to them.
Curious how a color silent film version of the Artist would have done Change up the gimmick
Mirror inspector is a job I could really see myself doing. -
Trax-3 — 12 years ago(March 01, 2014 02:02 PM)
The Artist was actually shot on colour film. Presumably converted to b&w in post production. Also, even though presented in fullscreen it was shot in 3-perf Super 35.
Natively it's a widescreen colour movie.
So, from the visual standpoint at least, it's rather gimmicky. -
Clyburn — 11 years ago(June 26, 2014 04:46 AM)
Me personally, I find Wings to be good "for its time."
The Artist is just good. Everything is better. Acting, cohesiveness, humor. Damn I love that dog.
The Artist is WAY higher on the rewatchability scale for me.
I know there is often a tendency to love old things because they're old - but for whatever reason, I don't have that in me. I just look at things objectively. I got the Artist rated 9 where Wings is a charitable 6. -
babyfir77 — 11 years ago(March 28, 2015 09:12 AM)
Having seen both, Wings, hands down. I've watched it perhaps three times, including right now. Was a 9 for me, but I'm going to raise it to a low ten. It's the relationships that do it for me. Normally I dislie war films. The Artist I give an eight. If I don't see it again, it wouldn't matter. Loved that dog, though!
-
ABetterDay — 10 years ago(July 18, 2015 02:28 PM)
Truly no offense but you show your age, or lack thereof, with this question.
Wings is a triumph rarely matched in the history of film. The Artist is a somewhat entertaining film that, although considered "great" in today's lackluster world of film, wouldn't have made dollar one in any year before 1967. It is mediocre at best.
Comparing The Artist to Wings, or nearly any of the great films from before 1967, is an exercise for the young and ignorant. Fear not.you will age.
Remember When Movies Did Not Have To Be Politically Correct? -
Shutup480 — 10 years ago(August 01, 2015 04:49 PM)
I agree, questions like this are just ridiculous, particularly about film. It's apples and oranges to say the very least. Why even bother comparing the two? Not only were they made almost 90 years apart, their stories are not even similar.ALL they have in common is that they are both silent pictures that won Best Picture at the Oscars and that is no grounds for comparison in my book.