Thoughts on the film's message (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
-
cobhc_for_life — 16 years ago(August 31, 2009 11:44 AM)
I started smoking pot at 16 years old. I got straight F's my freshman and sophomore years. I told me parents i was sick of education and didn't even want to bother with it anymore. They flipped the beep out and demanded I make it to UCLA or some crap. Then I started making friends with the potheads, and they ALWAYS had pot. junior and senior years I got all A's and B's, made up every single credit i beep up on, and managed to hit the minimum credit requirement by the very end of the year. i made it to college and im actually starting my second year today. and i wouldn't have gotten anywhere close to this point if it wasn't for pot. and now my parents know about it and they're threatening to test my urine at random. why? because pot is DANGEROUS!!! and ILLEGAL!!!
i can't wait to move out, im never gonna call my parents ever again, it'll be the best years of my life. -
sheens43 — 15 years ago(May 06, 2010 06:23 PM)
It doesn't "make" you sit around watching TV and eating junk food; it just happens that those are enjoyable to do while high. Just like alcohol doesn't force you to have sex, but it does make sex feel better. It still comes down to the person's individual choice. I've been high where I was productive, and didn't sit around doing nothing.
-
rwsmith29456 — 17 years ago(December 28, 2008 08:35 PM)
If the movie was about drugs in general, I'd say that yes, it could happen and it does, but pinning all that on weed is beyond ridiculous. I've known a lot of people from 53 years that smoked dope and 99% of them never even committed a crime, except for possesion of marijuana.
-
Comradedent-1 — 17 years ago(March 22, 2009 11:55 AM)
From my understanding over 1 million non-violent offenders are in prison because of this movie and that is nothing to laugh about. This movie was released in 1936 and the tax law was passed in 1937, as the op says it was very convincing to middle america at this time and the moral crusaders who lost the battle against alcohol 4 years earlier got their revenge with this monroe doctrine of the drug war.
Legalization needs to come and it needs to come quickly, the government needs to suck up it's controlling ways and stop being our parents.
P.s. This is not coming from a pothead, I like alcohol better -
Scotty7617 — 17 years ago(March 27, 2009 01:25 PM)
"I don't know what others think, but it seemed to me to make a pretty convincing arguement against marijuana use."
Exaggerating the dangers of drugs does far more damage than they would do otherwise. You can lie to kids and tell them that smoking pot will cause them to act the way the kids in the movie do. You can tell them that pot is in the same category as drugs like crack, PCP, or meth.
But what's going to happen when they eventually smoke pot, either through peer pressure or curiosity, and they don't act like in the movie, or it doesn't have the same effects as the hard drugs?
They're going to think "Well, if they were lying about that, they must have been lying about the dangers of the other stuff too."
"We'll settle this the old Navy way. First guy to die loses." -
lolmao500 — 16 years ago(September 07, 2009 10:53 PM)
Pretty much everything in the movie they claimed was
due to marijuanacould also been caused by alcohol
Pedestrianbeing more happy, ect
Also, the guy whokilled his family with an axewas probably on anti-depressantsnot marijuana.