Overrated
-
rebeljenn — 21 years ago(March 10, 2005 11:25 AM)
I am not sure of the other films that were released that same year (1942) or whether or not they would have been worthy of the Oscars or not, but, more importantly, I don't think any of us completely agree with the Oscars. Many good films have been missed out completely or over-rated.
I thought that this was a beautiful film. It is fiction but I think they did a good job making it and it made me feel that there was a war going on, based on the stories I have heard from people who did go through this time. (It was also made in the 40s so I don't agree with the inaccuracies here.) I think you're reading too much into it. It's just a film.- Jenn
-
netstvdvs — 20 years ago(August 14, 2005 12:04 PM)
Well said, igatekeeperi. Many people seem analyze a film to death. For myself, goofs in accuracy or continuity, issues with dramatic license, and other technical details don't bother me if the story, the acting, and the filmmaking are of sufficient quality to entertain or enlighten me. Such is definitely the case with this film. It doesn't matter that "love" doesn't rhyme precisely with "prove". Just shut up and enjoy the poetry.
"I've been smart; I recommend pleasant. You can quote me" - Elwood P. Dowd -
NoirDamedotcom — 20 years ago(September 29, 2005 03:49 PM)
I'm surprised by the negative comments regarding this film, especially those concerned with the accents of the actors, how late it gets dark in England, what time flower festivals start, etc.
With all due respect, the real point of the film has been lost on some viewers. It's not just about World War II, or England, it's about survival and the human spirit.
I was thrilled to see this film airing on TCM this afternoon. Let me explain. Less than 24 hours ago, my family and I returned to the Texas area after fleeing Hurricane Rita. We dealt with incredible traffic jams getting out of the city, then gas, ice, water shortages. We drove to Arkansas in order to find an available hotel room. Once there, we shared our hotel room (one of the last ones available in the city) with another couple, friends who had evacuated Louisiana. Imagine four people and five animals sharing a room with one bed, a room which also lost power when Rita rode over Arkanasas. It was a once in a lifetime experience which I'd rather not repeat - although it had its moments, when people in the darkened lobby began singing and playing violin by flashlight!
On our way home, we drove through areas which had no electricity, and downed trees, in overpowering heat. At one gas station the cops had been called because customers were fighting over water and ice! And kid you not, we were incredibly lucky. Just read the Houston Chronicle about people in East Texas, or listen online to stories being broadcast from the United Broadcasters of New Orleans.
When people are faced with disaster, it brings out their true colors. The best thing to do is keep doing, and that's what's so special about Mrs. Miniver - the character and the movie. This family does not give up, no matter how difficult things get. The two parents do their best to provide as normal a life as they can for their children and everyone around them.
When I got up this morning, looking at the many things I have to do to get my family and business running again, I was overwhelmed. I happened to switch on the TV and see Greer Garson running her household with great aplomb, even as her husband and son participated in the great evacuation of Dunkirk. If she can keep going with such panache and a stiff upper lip, anyone can. That's the real point of the film. -
alistla — 20 years ago(October 15, 2005 12:02 AM)
Well said, NoirDame. Contemporary Americans are so spoiled, they don't understand deprivation or struggle. To all who criticize the accents, sets, cat's performance, etc., of this movie: Keep in mind that it was made during a war. A world war, in which Britain was literally fighting for its life. Thousands of German planes were flying overhead, trying to bomb the morale out of them. Virtually every able-bodied British man was deeply involved in the war, not free to take a cruise ship to America to act in a movie. That's why so many of the actors were American, and why the sets were less than perfectly authentic. What I really appreciated about the film was that it took time to develop the characters and differentiate them from each other. A contemporary version of this film (which is impossible to imagine isn't that sad?) would have gotten to the war part within 10 minutes of the beginning. In Mrs. Miniver, the war doesn't get started until at least 30-40 minutes in. By then we've gotten to know the characters quite well, and so we really care about them as the film continues. Such a refreshing change of pace. And I really beg to differ about the bomb shelter scene it was extremely affecting, especially how it built from the characters acting nonchalantly in the beginning (the cat too one assumes that by this point everyone, even the cat, have grown accustomed to this drill), then as the bombing gets closer things get more tense. The acting may be too subtle for some, but I found it wonderfully understated. Beautifully done, overall.
-
KRAZYLOU2 — 20 years ago(October 27, 2005 09:55 PM)
YOU ARE OVERRATED!
IT'S A MOVIE. IT CAN'T BE PERFECT.
YOU'RE NITPICKING ON EVERYLITTLE DETAIL YOU CAN FIND, WHEN IN FACT THE MOVIE TELLS THE STORY VERY WELL.
YOU CAN MAKE A LIST OF NITPICKING FOR ANY FILM, EVER MADE. GET A LIFE.
MISTAKES ARE FOUND IN SOME OF THE GREATEST FILMS EVER MADE, REMEMBER THAT. -
teaching7 — 20 years ago(November 15, 2005 12:17 PM)
You have mistaken "Mrs Miniver" (a great film) with its sequel (Miniver Story) in which the scene you described appeared scene appeared. The first is generally regarded as great and the second is generally regarded as unnecessary sequel to a story well and completely told in the first rendition. I urge you to rent "Mrs. Miniver" also starring Greer Garson. It is a true cinematic gem.
-
hotmaledot1 — 20 years ago(January 18, 2006 05:16 AM)
What is the big deal with the cat washing itself as the bombs fall? On HMS Duke of York during its engagement with the Scharnhorst the ships cat slept soundly throughout the entire battle, the lazy little bleeder.
-
johnnodowne — 20 years ago(March 01, 2006 02:44 AM)
Hello LB or should I say Jimmy?
I was really looking forward to seeing this film, found it and weatched it. What a load of dreadful syrupy kitsch!! Absolutely awful - average or poor acting, appaling accents and a pathetic view of England ("quaint" is the wod i think). This film enforced stereotypes amongsth the American public about England that has plagued England ever since.
I am utterly lost as to why this film had a single oscar nomination let alone a win.
Just think of other films of the war years Rebecca, Citizen Kane etc. No comparison. One of William Wyler's more embarrassing moments.
Johnster
Bahrain -
RainbowCatPenny — 19 years ago(June 13, 2006 08:01 AM)
I've seen the movie last night (stayed up until 3 o'clock in the morning!) and must confess, I've seen much stronger performances of Greer Garson.
One fact, however, is true. She was amazingly beautiful. And to be honest, if I have a look at the photos of my grandparents, my grandma never looked that elegant during WW II. But as someone else has already said: It's a movie and it's there to entertain. So, do just that, enjoy!
But to me I have to say: I too cannot understand why it won so many Oscars. But that's just my personal meaning. -
angharad83 — 18 years ago(September 29, 2007 03:28 PM)
With all due respect, just because someone doesn't share your taste in films this doesn't mean they don't know what they are talking about. Mrs Miniver was flawed in many ways - if you find the film powerful enough to overlook these things, that is fine. But for others it just makes it painfully corny