Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Not very credible

Not very credible

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
12 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — I Bury the Living


    brand78 — 18 years ago(March 10, 2008 07:06 AM)

    I have this movie on DVD, region 2. The story is not very credible - but then what horror movie is? Particularly far-fetched is the notion that Andy could remove the remains of so many people unaided..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      florbing — 17 years ago(August 22, 2008 10:50 PM)

      I thought it was strange that the police saw and let Andy dig up all the graves. He should have been arrested during the first digging. Then he would not have died, but the main character's testimony plus corroborative evidence should have been enough to convict him of the murders as well as defamation of a corpse.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Stormyv120 — 17 years ago(August 22, 2008 11:00 PM)

        I still think Bill Honegger did it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          florbing — 17 years ago(August 22, 2008 11:04 PM)

          Bill Honegger does everythingperiod.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            IFeedPigeons — 16 years ago(May 13, 2009 05:19 PM)

            Dammit you two, I did/do not!

            • Bill Honegger
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              vpilutis — 16 years ago(May 23, 2009 01:08 PM)

              Now I just saw the film a few hrs ago, but the volume on my old TV is having some problems when the actors talk low.
              1, Why did and HOW did he kill those people and the young couple?
              2, seeing as he didn't see which pins were in which plots how did he know WHO to kill?
              3, Why did they make us think the dead were un-digging the plots?
              Over all a real mish/mush
              http://www.moola.com:80/moopubs/b2b/exc/join.jsp?sid=4d6a55744d7a45794e544d3d-2

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                tgemberl — 15 years ago(February 13, 2011 05:04 PM)

                (Spoilers)
                I think the plot is generally plausible. The motivation of the caretaker is believable: he is threatened by the Richard Boone character and tries to scare him away. He pays enough attention to the map to know where the white and black pins are. Notice that Boone is always trying to get him to go away. Clearly, he's constantly watching Boone.
                But some of the details don't hold together. How does he kill the young couple in a car accident? That doesn't seem believable.
                "Extremism in the pursuit of moderation is no vice."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  ObsidianPhoenix — 14 years ago(September 26, 2011 09:31 AM)

                  I always thought the accident with the young couple really was just a coincidence, and then after seeing it's effect on Robert, the caretaker started doing the other murders.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    liscarkat-2 — 13 years ago(May 04, 2012 09:51 AM)

                    That makes sense, and is about the only way to explain it. But how did he make it so one guy had a brain hemorrhage, another guy had a heart attack, etc?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      SSteveL — 13 years ago(October 30, 2012 03:17 PM)

                      How does he kill the young couple in a car accident? That doesn't seem believable.
                      Andy McKee (the caretaker):
                      "I only killed five. You gave me only five. Not the young Drexel couple".

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        phil-k-664-368870 — 12 years ago(March 24, 2014 11:27 AM)

                        Why did he dig them up? He didn't see the pins had been changed from black to whiteor did he?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          ObscureAuteur — 10 years ago(January 19, 2016 04:49 AM)

                          Posts elsewhere indicate there should have been a more logical (in supernatural story terms) ending when the new white pin people rise from their graves go to the house and invite Robert Kraft to join them and he dies. The actual ending really makes no sense and throws away the entire preceding build up. I do not know what the makers could have thinking at that point.
                          One of the user reviews complains that "it could have pre-dated
                          NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD
                          by 10 years" (1968). Not really. No Zombie Apocalypse here even with the right ending. It is more like it would have pre-dated
                          Carnival of Souls
                          (1962) by four years.
                          CB
                          Good Times, Noodle Salad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups