'The Atheist who believes in God': nuanced character twist or cop out?
-
thesnowleopard — 10 years ago(May 13, 2015 12:37 PM)
I was always under the impression that Drummond was a believer and, in fact, a Christian, not an agnostic nor an atheist. He simply wasn't the fundamentalist kind of Christian that prevailed in the town, or that blindly hated science and other kinds of knowledge (people on both sides tend to forget the number of devout Christians in history who have given us major advances in science). Everyone, including Hornbeck, had assumptions about Drummond that were rigid and untrue. Drummond didn't bother to correct them, that's all.
Innsmouth Free Press
http://www.innsmouthfreepress.com -
atlasmb — 10 years ago(May 13, 2015 08:30 PM)
Let me paraphrase an exchange between the two courtroom opponents:
Brady: Faith is the most important thing.
Drummond: Then why is man plagued with the ability to think (reason)?
Drummond is asserting that reason supersedes faith. All believers know that faith is the only true path to belief. The story of Abraham is one good example.
A quote from Cliff Notes about the character Drummond: "He is idealistic and claims to be an agnostic, believing that knowing whether God exists isn't possible." -
TheGutterMonkey — 9 years ago(September 22, 2016 08:16 AM)
Every atheist most certainly
does not
believe in god. However, the wonder and quest for answers that the theists find in god and religion
is
a similar thing that we find in reason and science. A theist may find fulfillment in their way but, through the wonder of science and exploration, we find our own kind of fulfillment in our search of the mysterious unknown. Questions are what we have in common. Our answers and ways of getting them are what differ.
S.C.W.
www.TheGutterMonkey.com -
jescci — 11 years ago(January 25, 2015 05:24 PM)
There's a shot at the beginning of the movie when the group is having dinner and Drummond is alone at a table fixing to dig into his humble wax-paper-wrapped sandwich. While the timing tight, it is no coincidence I believe that Drummond does not actually bite into the raised sandwich until Brady has completely finished saying grace.
-
pepperdog61 — 10 years ago(May 17, 2015 06:31 PM)
I believe that Clarence Darrow, upon whom the Drummond character is based, was agnostic. Drummond is also referred to as an agnostic twice, once by Hornbeck ("We're growing a strange crop of agnostics this year") and once by Brady ("Is there anything that is holy to the celebrated agnostic?" or something like that).
-
scott-269-715736 — 10 years ago(July 02, 2015 10:32 AM)
Clarence Darrow appears to confirm it when he said, "I am an agnostic; I do not pretend to know what many ignorant men are sure of."
As I recall Darrow also prepared the Bible questions long before the Scopes trial. He realized the Bible is flawed either in facts or the way they are recorded. Once he was denied any witnesses to give scientific testimony he brought out his list of Biblical challenges and managed to get Bryan to slip up on his former unchallenged fundamentalist claims.
If the movie makes changes to the events for entertainment's sake, I like to believe they stuck with the nature of both men. I don't see it as a cop out at all to stick to the truth of their lives when possible - overlooking the close relationship they never had. Even E.K. Hornbeck had some of H.L. Mencken's traits, even though Mencken went back home before Bryan took the stand and certainly didn't share a room with Darrow.
Today I believe hollywood might make Henry Drummond an atheist and in doing so, weaken the movie into a winner takes all battle between science and religion. That seems like it would be cop out for a complex character, plus we would lose some of the great lines from the script. -
TheGutterMonkey — 9 years ago(September 22, 2016 09:07 AM)
Today I believe hollywood might make Henry Drummond an atheist and in doing so, weaken the movie into a winner takes all battle between science and religion. That seems like it would be cop out for a complex character, plus we would lose some of the great lines from the script.
If you were to question most atheists you'd find that they are nothing more than agnostics (and vice versa). "Agnostic", however, is a label with much less of a stigma attached to it. The prefix "a-" goes before words to mean "not this" or "without this" (like amoral or asexual). "Theism" is the belief in a god. Therefore, an "a-theist" is someone who is
without
or
does not have
belief in a god. It doesn't mean that they
have a belief
that there is no god or feel for certain that there is no god (atheism isn't making a statement, it's merely a way of saying "I'm not the statement that
they
are making). And that's why most atheists, when questioned about their beliefs, will give you the same answer as an agnostic. Many (if not most) atheists tend to get annoyed by the repeated confusion by people that are under the impression that an atheist is someone who proclaims to
know
there is no god. We don't. We're simply not theists. (However, there is a small group who go into minute detail in their self-labeling.)
"Gnostic", by the way, has to do with knowledge. So, of course, an agnostic is someone who proclaims to not have knowledge about a particular subject ("I don't know", as you usually hear them say). That's why you'll often hear atheists call the term "agnostic" a cop-out, just because it's saying the same thing but in a less taboo way. The word "agnostic", after all, is only 147 years old and was coined by none other than "Darwin's Bulldog", Thomas Henry Huxley, when he was actively promoting the recently discovered theory of evolution to crowds of religious folks who more than likely weren't fond of the term "atheist".
As mentioned in a previous post, the film
Contact
also addresses the conflicts between the religious and non-religious. And its protagonist
is
an atheist. Yet this movie, too, handles the topic fairly. So, personally, I don't think that it would be so bad if Drummond was shown to be an atheist if this was ever remade. However, I believe Clarence Darrow was big on calling himself an "agnostic", though, so it probably still shouldn't be changed.
S.C.W.
www.TheGutterMonkey.com -
TheGutterMonkey — 9 years ago(September 22, 2016 08:03 AM)
What I always took from the film was that Drummond was (almost certainly, in my opinion) an agnostic just like the real-life man who he was based on. When he's speaking of god at the end of the film I feel like he was just doing so in a poetic sense and in reverence to a man who he disagreed with, but who he still respected. He didn't think it was right to mock or ridicule people for what they believed and he respected peoples right to believe it (unlike Gene Kelly's character who had no respect for those he disagreed with). His goals were never to try and preach to people to believe his way, but rather to find a common ground where both could meet and get along; this is what I felt the meaning was behind his placement of the Bible on top of Darwin's
On the Origin of Species
it was meant to show that both men of science
and
men of god could share the world together, regardless of their differing beliefs.
Incidentally, I think this is similar to how the film
Contact
handled the clash between the religious and non-religious, and how while we both may have different opinions there are still commonalities between us and how we feel passion, hope, awe, and wonder, just in our own different ways.
Unsurprisingly, some also complain about the end of that film because they feel the protagonists sudden "faith" in the aliens (she believed she met them even though she couldn't prove it; i.e., there was a parallel to the faith in god) was a cop out to her atheistic nature.
S.C.W.
www.TheGutterMonkey.com